Validation of the Community Integration Questionnaire in the adult burn injury population

Gerrard, Paul; Kazis, Lewis E.; Ryan, Colleen M.; Shie, Vivian L.; Holavanahalli, Radha; Lee, Austin F. S.; Jette, Alan M.; Fauerbach, James A.; Esselman, Peter C.; Herndon, David N.; Schneider, Jeffrey C.

doi:10.1007/s11136-015-0997-4

Cited by 29 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Data recorded using self-assessment questionnaires were: depression and anxiety using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) (13), fatigue using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) (14), functional outcome using the Barthel Index (BI) (15). Moreover, we explored several categories of participation according to the ICF model (16) and focused on Domestic Life, Economic/social productivity, Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) which is composed by a global score and three sub-scores (integration at home, social integration, productivity) (17). The higher these sub-scores are, the higher the participation in specific categories is.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sequelae and Quality of Life in Patients Living at Home 1 Year After a Stroke Managed in Stroke Units

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Knowledge about residual deficiencies and their consequences on daily life activities among stroke patients living at home 1-year after the initial event managed in stroke units is poor. This multi-dimensional study assessed the types of deficiencies, their frequency and the consequences that the specific stroke had upon the daily life of patients. Methods: A cross-sectional survey, assessing, using standardized scales, 1 year post-stroke disabilities, limitations of activities, participation and quality of life, was carried out by telephone interview and by mail in a sample of stroke patients who returned home after having been initially managed in a stroke unit. Results: A total of 161 patients were included (142 able to answer the interview on their own; 19 needing a care-giver). Amongst a sub-group of the patients interviewed, 55.4% (95% Confidence Interval [47.1–63.7]) complained about pain and 60.0% (95% CI [51.4–68.6]) complained of fatigue; about 25% presented neuropsychological or neuropsychiatric disability. Whilst 87.3% (95% CI [81.7–92.9]) were independent for daily life activities, participation in every domains and quality of life scores, mainly in daily activity, pain, and anxiety subscales, were low. Conclusion: Despite a good 1-year post-stroke functional outcome, non-motor disabling symptoms are frequent amongst patients returned home and able to be interviewed, contributing to a low level of participation and a poor quality of life. Rehabilitation strategies focused on participation should be developed to break the vicious circle of social isolation and improve quality of life.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sequelae and Quality of Life in Patients Living at Home 1 Year After a Stroke Managed in Stroke Units

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…18 Internal consistency of the Home Integration subscale was adequate for all populations with which it was studied. The internal consistency of the total score was also adequate with all populations, [17][18][19]22,24 except for multiple sclerosis. 20 This is coherent with the results obtained with the traumatic brain injury population.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…One item cross-loaded on both factors. 22 A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted only with the burn survivor's population, which is an important step to ensure the quality of a factorial analysis. The methodological quality is sufficient according to the MacDermid and COS-MIN checklists.…”

Section: Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire: a systematic review of five populations

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:This systematic review documents the content and the quality of the psychometric evidence concerning the utilization of the Community Integration Questionnaire for individuals living with a disability other than a traumatic brain injury.Data sources:Medline, Embase, CINAHL, OTseeker and PsycINFO (searched from inception to June 2019).Review methods:Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for conducting and reporting this review. Studies that investigated at least one psychometric property of the Community Integration Questionnaire for individuals living with a disability other than traumatic brain injury were included. Data extraction and critical methodological appraisal of the articles (MacDermid checklist, COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist) were independently performed and validated by the first two authors.Results:Ten studies representing 3000 individuals met the inclusion criteria. Five populations were documented. There are positive and trustable data regarding internal consistency for adults living with multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or burns and in mixed samples ( α = 0.71–0.84). Construct validity is fairly documented for adults living with multiple sclerosis or aphasia and in mixed samples. Test–retest reliably is acceptable for adults living with multiple sclerosis (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91–0.97) as well as responsiveness (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.81). Other psychometric properties could not be demonstrated sufficiently solid.Conclusion:Many psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire are still poorly evaluated for adults living with a disability other than a traumatic brain injury. However, promising data have been documented in each population included in this review.

show abstract

“…Examining the CIQ domain scores from our sample to scores from studies with other disease conditions, our DM group means scores in all CIQ domains and CIQ Total were higher (more integrated) than the participants with aphasia, physical disability, brain injury, aphasia and burns (13,15,20,25,26] (SCI, multiple sclerosis, limb loss, muscular dystrophy), malignant brain tumor, and TBI. Thus, our DM group had less activity and participation limitations compared to other disease groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…The CIQ is composed of three domains: Home Integration, Social Integration, and Productive Activities [12]. The CIQ has been used with people with a variety of conditions [12][13][14][15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of the Community Integration Questionnaire as a Measure of Participation in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus

Lp¹,

Mh²

2016

J Diabetes Metab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) with people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). The CIQ measures levels of participation and frequency of engagement in activities.Methods: A convenience sample of 97 women participated in the study in three groups (DM=32; Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)=29; Healthy Controls=36). Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, Keitel Functional Test, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information Project (COOP), and the CIQ. Results:The groups were similar in age, disease duration, education, and marital status. The DM group had significantly better joint motion compared to the RA group. For all CIQ domains and the CIQ Total, the scores of the DM group were each significantly higher than the RA group and similar to the HC group. A similar trend was found for the other measures of participation, the HAQ and COOP Total. In the DM group, the correlations between the CIQ Social, CIQ Productivity, CIQ Total and the HAQ and COOP were moderate to good. There were no significant correlations between the CIQ Home and the HAQ and COOP Total. Conclusion:The findings provide partial support for known-groups validity of the CIQ as there were significant differences in CIQ scores between individuals with DM and RA, two very different chronic diseases. However, there were no differences between the DM and HC groups. Concurrent validity in people with DM was established by the correlations between the CIQ Social, CIQ Productivity, and CIQ Total and the HAQ and COOP with people with DM. However, larger studies are needed to support these findings.

show abstract

Validation of the Community Integration Questionnaire in the adult burn injury population

Abstract: The CIQ-13 demonstrates validity and reliability in the adult burn survivor population addressing issues of self/family care and social integration. This instrument is useful in future research of community reintegration outcomes in the burn population.

Cited by 29 publications

References 21 publications

Sequelae and Quality of Life in Patients Living at Home 1 Year After a Stroke Managed in Stroke Units

Sequelae and Quality of Life in Patients Living at Home 1 Year After a Stroke Managed in Stroke Units

Psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire: a systematic review of five populations

Validity of the Community Integration Questionnaire as a Measure of Participation in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About