2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3508-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Chinese version of functional assessment of anorexia-cachexia therapy (FAACT) scale for measuring quality of life in cancer patients with cachexia

Abstract: The Chinese version of FAACT scale has good reliability and validity and is suitable for measuring QOL of cachexia patients in Chinese population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, exploration of the evaluation tools of cachexia in MHD-treated patients is of high clinical signi cance. FAACT has been veri ed as a tool to measure the quality of life of patients with cachexia related to many diseases [8,9] . This study may serve as a reference for the evaluation of cachexia in MHD-treated patients and for the development of FAACT scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, exploration of the evaluation tools of cachexia in MHD-treated patients is of high clinical signi cance. FAACT has been veri ed as a tool to measure the quality of life of patients with cachexia related to many diseases [8,9] . This study may serve as a reference for the evaluation of cachexia in MHD-treated patients and for the development of FAACT scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study assessed the reliability and validity of FAACT in MHD-treated patients. In terms of reliability (Table 2), Cronbach's alpha was acceptable, but PWB and FWB were less than 0.7, and FAACT and ACS performed better than other disease detection areas [8,21] . The performance of FAACT test-retest was also outstanding, with the retest coe cients of all dimensions exceeding 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations