Validation of the Chinese version of the PHQ-15 in a tertiary hospital

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) in a tertiary hospital.MethodsUsing a cross-sectional study design, the Chinese version of the PHQ-15 was administered to a total of 1329 inpatients. To examine the discriminant validity of this questionnaire, we investigated the correlation of the PHQ-15 score with sociodemographic data and the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scale scores. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess the internal consistency of the PHQ-15. To evaluate the consistency of this questionnaire with item response theory (IRT), IRT analysis was performed.ResultsThe Chinese version of the PHQ-15 showed good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83). The correlations of the PHQ-15 scores with the PHQ-9 depression scale scores (r = 0.565) and the GAD-7 anxiety scale scores (r = 0.512) were moderate; these results suggested that the PHQ-15 had discriminant validity. We identified three factors, referred to as “cardiopulmonary,” “gastrointestinal,” and “pain/neurological,” which explained 56 % of the total variance. A second-order factor analysis including these three factors produced an acceptable model. Several items (4, 8 and 11) displayed extreme floor effects. Additionally, item 4 displayed a very small variance of 0.35 and showed very small differences in its thresholds based on IRT analysis.ConclusionsThe PHQ-15 scale had good reliability and high validity to detect patients with high somatic symptom severity in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Several of the current findings were consistent with previous research on the PHQ-15 in Western countries and in China. To improve the diagnostic quality of this questionnaire, items 4, 8 and 11 can be omitted.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0798-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Reliability and validity of the Farsi version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with Iranian psychiatric outpatients

“…PHQ-15 scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cutoff points for low, medium, and high somatic symptom severity, respectively. Research indicates high reliability and validity of the PHQ-15 in different samples and various settings [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. Because somatoform symptoms, such as pain, headaches, trouble sleeping, appetite disturbance, and fatigue or loss of energy may be associated with depression, the patients also answered the PHQ-15.The WHO-5 is a commonly used measure of subjective psychological and emotional well-being.…”

Assessment of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) for DSM-5 for Somatic Symptom Disorder in General Hospital Outpatient Clinics in China

“…Exercise was classi ed as >2 h/day, 1-2 h/day, <1 h/day, and no physical exercise. The PHQ-15 was validated in Chinese for somatic symptoms [14,15]. SSS-8 is a self-rating scale used to quantify the somatic symptom burden of patients in the past week and has been validated in Chinese [16].…”

Health literacy and health outcomes in China’s floating population: mediating effects of health services

“…The short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) from the US was used to assess self-evaluated health [24]; it mainly measures self-perceived health compared to others around the subject using a five-point Likert scale. A simplified version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) was used to measure physiological health; the Chinese version has shown good validity and reliability [25]. The scale includes headache, chest pain, and arthralgia, assessed on a five-point Likert scale.…”