2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Arabic Version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Fu et al (2016) [47] and Mogle et al (2017) [48] who have validated the MLHFQ to Taiwan and Spanish populations, the mean MLHFQ score was 25.3 and 27.8 respectively. But a couple of studies have reported higher mean MLHFQ scores [49,50]. Therefore, the sample used in the present study may not represent the wide spectrum of HF population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Fu et al (2016) [47] and Mogle et al (2017) [48] who have validated the MLHFQ to Taiwan and Spanish populations, the mean MLHFQ score was 25.3 and 27.8 respectively. But a couple of studies have reported higher mean MLHFQ scores [49,50]. Therefore, the sample used in the present study may not represent the wide spectrum of HF population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, patients were also asked to complete two questionnaires: the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) [ 16,17 ] and the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) [ 18,19 ] to assess their QOL and depression respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLHFQ has a summative score that ranges from 0 to 105; the higher the score, the lower the QOL. [ 16,17 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLHFQ has advantages over generic scales, as it has the responsiveness and the capacity to discriminate between different magnitudes of change in individuals' HRQoL (Garin et al, 2009;Rajati et al, 2016;Napier et al, 2018;Gonzalez-SaenzdeTejada et al, 2019). This scale has been adapted and translated to at least 34 languages in various countries and has shown good psychometric properties (Sneed et al, 2001;Bennett et al, 2003;Heo et al, 2005;Ho et al, 2007;Garin et al, 2008Garin et al, , 2013Garin et al, , 2014Moon et al, 2012;Bilbao et al, 2016;Zahwe et al, 2020). Yet, up to date, there is a lack of studies that would examine the reliability/precision and validity of the MLHFQ in a large sample of individuals with CAD following ACS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, some of the studies indicated a two-factor solution (i.e., physical and emotional dimensions) (Middel et al, 2001;Garin et al, 2013;Brokalaki et al, 2015;Bilbao et al, 2016) that includes the original MLHFQ study (Rector and Cohn, 1992). However, ample published studies that validated the three-factor internal structure of the MLHFQ also exist (Heo et al, 2005;Ho et al, 2007;Moon et al, 2012;Lambrinou et al, 2013;Munyombwe et al, 2014;Mogle et al, 2017;Barnett et al, 2019;Zahwe et al, 2020) that report the potential existence of a third factor of "social domain." Even though the inconsistent findings might be attributed to a variety of methodological aspects and cultural differences, further studies in a large sample of individuals with HF are warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%