2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging of Patients With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Abstract: Key Points Question Is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging of metastatic cutaneous melanoma prognostic in the era of immune checkpoint inhibition? Findings In this cohort study of 357 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the AJCC eighth edition M staging showed limited prognostic stratification; however, the overall survival rates among patients with liver metastases and thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, patients with liver metastases had an inferior overall response rate (ORR, 0.33; P = .02), progression-free survival (PFS, HR, 4.03; P < .01), and overall survival (OS, HR, 3.17; P = .01) compared to those without liver metastasis. A larger recently published study (36), examined the effect of liver metastases on 1009 patients with advanced melanoma. Here, liver metastasis was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.22 for death ( 95% CI, 1.48-3.33; P < .001) and 2.0 for progression (95% CI 2.00 (1.36-2.79; P<0.001) in a Cox proportional hazard model.…”
Section: Clinical Data With Liver Metastasis Treated With Icimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, patients with liver metastases had an inferior overall response rate (ORR, 0.33; P = .02), progression-free survival (PFS, HR, 4.03; P < .01), and overall survival (OS, HR, 3.17; P = .01) compared to those without liver metastasis. A larger recently published study (36), examined the effect of liver metastases on 1009 patients with advanced melanoma. Here, liver metastasis was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.22 for death ( 95% CI, 1.48-3.33; P < .001) and 2.0 for progression (95% CI 2.00 (1.36-2.79; P<0.001) in a Cox proportional hazard model.…”
Section: Clinical Data With Liver Metastasis Treated With Icimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed a 32.5% [95% CI: 26.1–38.9] CR rate, which is above figures obtained in melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] or combined ipilimumab + nivolumab [ 26 ], despite numerous patients with active intracranial metastasis and/or non-treatment-naïve status being included. The high percentage of AJCC M1c and M1d patients, with high LDH serum levels, ECOG performance status >1, or liver metastasis, which all represent poor prognostic factors [ 27 ], also highlights real-life patients’ severity. Benefits of RT were observed particularly in patients failing anti-PD-1 blockade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver metastases are common in advanced melanoma and are associated with poor response to immunotherapy [ 23 ]. Specifically, in a retrospective analysis of 357 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma receiving single or double agent immunotherapy, those with liver metastases and elevated serum LDH had a median OS of 4.2 months [ 24 ]. As such, it is possible that patients presenting with symptomatic liver metastases began immunotherapy treatment soon after diagnosis yet still experienced poor survival outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%