2016
DOI: 10.1177/0003319716659179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the 6-Month GRACE Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Admitted to the Arabian Gulf Hospitals

Abstract: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the most common cardiovascular diseases and are associated with a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score postdischarge is a widely used ACS prediction model for risk of mortality (low, intermediate, and high); however, it has not yet been validated in patients from the Arabian Gulf. This prospective multicenter study (second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events) provides detailed information of the GRACE … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are several tools 3,4 available for determining the prognosis of NSTE-ACS patients, such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score which is recommended in clinical guidelines, 5 the establishment of more simple and more effective tools is still required. The GRACE risk score has been validated in several studies [6][7][8][9][10] ; however, the score does not include measurement of some important biomarkers. Therefore, a novel more simple and effective tool established using important biomarkers may provide more accurate risk estimation in ACS patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several tools 3,4 available for determining the prognosis of NSTE-ACS patients, such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score which is recommended in clinical guidelines, 5 the establishment of more simple and more effective tools is still required. The GRACE risk score has been validated in several studies [6][7][8][9][10] ; however, the score does not include measurement of some important biomarkers. Therefore, a novel more simple and effective tool established using important biomarkers may provide more accurate risk estimation in ACS patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) are the most commonly used risk scores in this regard. 5 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we detail the processing and cleaning done in Stage I of our proposed methodology. The data were collected from a second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Tang, Wong, & Herbison, ; Thalib et al, ) including consecutive patients with ACS from six Arabian Gulf Countries (Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen). These patients belonged to 65 different hospitals during the period of data collection during the period October 2008 to June 2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the current study is designed to validate the GRACE risk score in predicting mortality at 1‐year post discharge amongst Arabian Gulf patients. Thalib et al () noted that GRACE has not been studied in connection with Arabian Gulf patients for propensity (survival) analysis and conduct one of the first studies with Arabian Gulf GRACE dataset. Granger et al () analyse in‐hospital mortality for GRACE data for hospitals in Western Europe, Oceania, and North America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%