2018
DOI: 10.1108/wjstsd-08-2017-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of technology push strategies for achieving sustainable development in manufacturing organizations through structural equation modeling

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate and select various significant technology push (TP) strategies affecting sustainable development in manufacturing organizations. The study deploys structural equation modeling (SEM) technique to empirically validate the interrelationships amongst significant TP strategies and sustainable development indicators in SEM-TP Model. Design/methodology/approach Confirmatory factor analysis approach is utilized to generate an effective SEM-TP Model by using AMOS 21… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical study results were found consistent with (Randhawa and Ahuja, 2017) who deployed SEM technique to empirically validate the interrelationships amongst significant variables of 5S implementation and business excellence performance parameters (BEPP) in SEM_5S model and concluded that SEM of 5S various parameters has established that attributes like top management involvement initiatives, employee involvement initiatives, basic 5S initiatives (BFSI) and fifth S initiatives (Shitsuke) should be holistically emphasised during the implementation of 5S program, leading to attainment of high level of melioration in the BEPP. Also, with (Singla et al, 2018) who used SEM technique to empirically validate the interrelationships amongst significant technology push (TP) strategies and sustainable development indicators in SEM-TP model and concluded two TP strategies namely, IC and CS are found to be significant in the present context. These strategies have emerged as a foundation for several development initiatives and actively support manufacturing industries in achieving sustainable development.…”
Section: Modification Indices Of Sem_tqm-tpm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our empirical study results were found consistent with (Randhawa and Ahuja, 2017) who deployed SEM technique to empirically validate the interrelationships amongst significant variables of 5S implementation and business excellence performance parameters (BEPP) in SEM_5S model and concluded that SEM of 5S various parameters has established that attributes like top management involvement initiatives, employee involvement initiatives, basic 5S initiatives (BFSI) and fifth S initiatives (Shitsuke) should be holistically emphasised during the implementation of 5S program, leading to attainment of high level of melioration in the BEPP. Also, with (Singla et al, 2018) who used SEM technique to empirically validate the interrelationships amongst significant technology push (TP) strategies and sustainable development indicators in SEM-TP model and concluded two TP strategies namely, IC and CS are found to be significant in the present context. These strategies have emerged as a foundation for several development initiatives and actively support manufacturing industries in achieving sustainable development.…”
Section: Modification Indices Of Sem_tqm-tpm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures. Trait emotion dysregulation was assessed using the 18-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Gratz & Roemer, 2004). Participants rated their agreement with 18 statements on a 1 ("almost never, 0-10%") to 5 ("almost always, 90-100%") scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotion regulation difficulties.…”
Section: Real Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…El modelo también cumple con el índice de bondad de ajuste, según los siguientes indicadores: CMIN / df, GFI, TLI, CFI y RMSEA. Los valores obtenidos muestran el ajuste adecuado del modelo de investigación (Tabla 6) (Singla et al, 2018).…”
Section: Modelo Estructuralunclassified