2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of spectral gas radiation models under oxyfuel conditions – Part C: Validation of simplified models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…681 Furthermore, it can be seen that the prediction of the heat flux is 682 better for lower temperature levels (1070°C) than for higher tem-683 perature levels (1200°C). The deviation between the measurement 684 and calculation is in accordance with investigations done by 685 Becher et al [25]. In the investigation they compared the …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…681 Furthermore, it can be seen that the prediction of the heat flux is 682 better for lower temperature levels (1070°C) than for higher tem-683 perature levels (1200°C). The deviation between the measurement 684 and calculation is in accordance with investigations done by 685 Becher et al [25]. In the investigation they compared the …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Their study focused on the combustion mechanisms or gas radiative models, but did not carry out detailed investigation on the combustion and heat transfer properties. The series of articles by Becher et al [19][20][21] validated the accuracy of existing spectral gas radiative models for oxy-fuel combustion, by comparing them to line-by-line model based on HITIMP2010. [22] The WSGG model from Johansson et al [23] was recommended for calculations of spectral gas radiation in large-scale oxy-fuel combustion simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSGG model is easy to incorporate into a CFD code. Considering computational costs, it may be the best selection in 3D full-scale simulations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%