2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003637
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Serological Tests for the Detection of Antibodies Against Treponema pallidum in Nonhuman Primates

Abstract: There is evidence to suggest that the yaws bacterium (Treponema pallidum ssp. pertenue) may exist in non-human primate populations residing in regions where yaws is endemic in humans. Especially in light of the fact that the World Health Organizaiton (WHO) recently launched its second yaws eradication campaign, there is a considerable need for reliable tools to identify treponemal infection in our closest relatives, African monkeys and great apes. It was hypothesized that commercially available serological tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Population size was based on wildlife survey data of Lower Saxony (Strauss, Ronnenberg, Klages, & Graeber, 2016). Test sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (0.92) were set according to the test performance reported in Knauf, Dahlmann, Batamuzi, Frischmann, and Liu (2015). Recent studies report a prevalence in EBHs from 33.0% to >74%, (Nováková et al, 2019; Verin, Pestelli, & Poli, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population size was based on wildlife survey data of Lower Saxony (Strauss, Ronnenberg, Klages, & Graeber, 2016). Test sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (0.92) were set according to the test performance reported in Knauf, Dahlmann, Batamuzi, Frischmann, and Liu (2015). Recent studies report a prevalence in EBHs from 33.0% to >74%, (Nováková et al, 2019; Verin, Pestelli, & Poli, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay has been validated for use in baboons ( 12 ), where it performed with 97.7% (95% CI 87.7%–99.9%) sensitivity and 96.0% (95% CI 79.7%–99.9%) specificity. We tested serum samples on the day of sampling and operated and interpreted test cassettes according to the manufacturer’s guidance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population size was used as shown in Table S1. Test sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (0.92) were set according to the test performance reported in Knauf et al 2012 [7]. Recent studies report a prevalence in EBHs from 33.0 to >74%, [8, 9].…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%