2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of SDL specifications using EFSM-based test generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are many works regarding test generation methods for EFSM models [12][13][14]. Huang [11] proposed a test sequence generation method by constructing a TEA tree.…”
Section: Figure 6 Reduce Rate Of Explored Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are many works regarding test generation methods for EFSM models [12][13][14]. Huang [11] proposed a test sequence generation method by constructing a TEA tree.…”
Section: Figure 6 Reduce Rate Of Explored Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In our earlier studies [30] [31], the focus of testing an SDL system is on coverage testing of each individual process (namely, each EFSM). We used the all-node and all-edge coverage criteria.…”
Section: Testing Communication Between Sdl Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test generation methodology discussed in our previous study [30] assumes that input messages will be delivered to an EFSM when needed. This simplification is clearly only valid when testing individual EFSMs using coverage criteria such as all-node or all-edge without considering communication aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSMs can model both control and data and a number of standard modelling languages such as Statecharts and SDL can be seen as EFSMs. EFSM based test techniques can be applied to models in such languages [7,8] as well as formalisms such as (UML) Use Cases and Z and in domains such as communication protocols and web services [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%