2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of SDL-based architectural design models using communication-based coverage criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They computed partial products of each pair of machines instead of complete reachability graph of the whole system. Restrepo et al [12] presented an approach to generated tests from CEFSMs with new criteria aimed at communicationbased coverage. CFSM and CEFSM can be used to describe the scenarios in which several protocol components communicate by message exchange, but cannot support the parallel components sharing variables in a same protocol entity.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They computed partial products of each pair of machines instead of complete reachability graph of the whole system. Restrepo et al [12] presented an approach to generated tests from CEFSMs with new criteria aimed at communicationbased coverage. CFSM and CEFSM can be used to describe the scenarios in which several protocol components communicate by message exchange, but cannot support the parallel components sharing variables in a same protocol entity.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they can only be used to model the protocol with single component. To model and test the protocols with multiple components, the CFSM (Communicating FSMs) is a widely accepted solution [9]- [12]. Actually, CFSMs work well for multiple network entities communicating with asynchronous messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [31] introduce a guided random walk procedure to cover the transitions in CFSM by probability. Restrepo et al [32] present an approach to generate tests with communication-based coverage.…”
Section: Multiple Components Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They computed partial products of each pair of machines instead of complete reachability graph of the whole system. Restrepo et al [23] presented an approach to generated tests from CEFSMs with new criteria aimed at communication-based coverage. CFSM and CEFSM can be used to describe the scenarios in which several protocol components communicate by message exchange, but cannot support the parallel components sharing variables in a same protocol entity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it scans the label queue (Line 7), which ensures that each label in this reachability graph can be dealt with sequentially and the labels not in this reachability graph can be skipped (Line 8-9). The main part of this algorithm is a searching action modified from classical BFS (Breadth-First Search) (Line [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For each Sync Label, we perform a round of BFS with a priority queue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%