1983
DOI: 10.1378/chest.83.4.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Respiratory Inductive Plethysmography in Patients with Pulmonary Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
8

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
53
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, respiratory inductive plethysmography was used. Although this is the most widely accepted method for noninvasive respiratory measurements, there is as much as 10% deviation between plethysmography and spirometry in patients with lung disease, even when using the least-squares calibration technique [27]. Conversely, highly reliable methods to determine minute ventilation would involve the use of a mouthpiece or a face mask, possibly giving rise to discomfort, alterations in breathing pattern and an artefactual increase in ventilation [28].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, respiratory inductive plethysmography was used. Although this is the most widely accepted method for noninvasive respiratory measurements, there is as much as 10% deviation between plethysmography and spirometry in patients with lung disease, even when using the least-squares calibration technique [27]. Conversely, highly reliable methods to determine minute ventilation would involve the use of a mouthpiece or a face mask, possibly giving rise to discomfort, alterations in breathing pattern and an artefactual increase in ventilation [28].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Patients displaying asynchronous thoraco-abdominal movement have increased risk of ventilatory failure, necessitating mechanical ventilation and, consequently, poorer prognosis. 16,17 To our knowledge, studies on thoraco-abdominal movement during HFNC are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are uncertain, however, about the validity of RIP data for measuring these parameters. Although RIP is reported to be the 'gold standard' for non-invasive breathing pattern recordings, the validity studies have been based on timing and volume measures, not on compartment contributions (Chadha and Sackner, 1983;Tobin et al, 1983aTobin et al, , 1983b. In our experience the recommended placement for the lower RIP band (umbilicus level) may not capture the area of the abdomen most likely to move during respiration.…”
Section: Breathing Pattern Changesmentioning
confidence: 95%