“…The value of RT3DE imaging in this context has been demonstrated by multiple studies that compared RT3DE volume measurements with widely accepted reference techniques, including radionuclide ventriculography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). [2][3][4][5][6] These studies and others have demonstrated higher levels of agreement between the RT3DE approach and the respective reference technique compared with conventional 2DE methodology. Additionally, RT3DE measurements were found to be more reproducible than 2DE 4,5,7 and, in some studies, even as reproducible as CMR.…”