2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that reaction time is related with cognitive functions in healthy controls and with cognitive functions and quality of life in malnutrition patients 44 . Kelly et al 45 examined the effects of cannabis on driving performance and found impaired reaction time in chronic cannabis users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that reaction time is related with cognitive functions in healthy controls and with cognitive functions and quality of life in malnutrition patients 44 . Kelly et al 45 examined the effects of cannabis on driving performance and found impaired reaction time in chronic cannabis users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting evidence supports is use: we and others have shown that more than half of liver patients with no other cause of brain involvement have an abnormal test result; that there is no learning or tiring effect; that the test result is not age or gender dependent; not related to educational or social status; and that it is not disturbed by sleep deprivation (Elsass 1986;Jakobsen et al 2010;Lauridsen et al 2014;Lauridsen et al 2012;Lauridsen et al 2013;Elsass et al 1985). However, the CRT test has not been systematically conducted in parallel with the PSE test and consequently has not been compared with a test of other cognitive domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Denmark, health professionals have many years of experience in using the computerized psychometric test, the Continuous Reaction Time test (CRT) (Jakobsen et al 2010), for diagnosing and grading MHE. Mounting evidence supports is use: we and others have shown that more than half of liver patients with no other cause of brain involvement have an abnormal test result; that there is no learning or tiring effect; that the test result is not age or gender dependent; not related to educational or social status; and that it is not disturbed by sleep deprivation (Elsass 1986;Jakobsen et al 2010;Lauridsen et al 2014;Lauridsen et al 2012;Lauridsen et al 2013;Elsass et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Reaction time has been correlated to cognitive function in both healthy and injured people, and reaction time was found to be inversely proportional to the quality of fine motor control. 17 In general, we should expect multiple reaction time measurements to be a reasonable parameter providing an objective measure for ability and training status, provided that the many variables discussed above are accounted for. For a generally ''normal'' population of people, using only a sight stimulus, reaction times measured by computer experiments have been reported as 268 milliseconds.…”
Section: Reaction Timementioning
confidence: 99%