2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12288-019-01196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Point of Care Hemoglobin Estimation Among Pregnant Women Using Digital Hemoglobinometers (HemoCue 301 and HemoCue 201+) as Compared with Auto-Analyzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HemoCue 301 analyzer has shown moderate agreement of Hgb level estimation when compared with the gold standard hematology autoanalyzer. 22 Of the 1,981 eligible mother-child dyads, 90 were excluded because the mother refused a Hgb measurement (Figure 1). Measurements were used as both a continuous and discrete variable categorized into severe anemia, moderate anemia, mild anemia, normal Hgb, and high Hgb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HemoCue 301 analyzer has shown moderate agreement of Hgb level estimation when compared with the gold standard hematology autoanalyzer. 22 Of the 1,981 eligible mother-child dyads, 90 were excluded because the mother refused a Hgb measurement (Figure 1). Measurements were used as both a continuous and discrete variable categorized into severe anemia, moderate anemia, mild anemia, normal Hgb, and high Hgb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using point-of-care HemoCue 301 machines for capillary blood, the Hb level can be determined immediately and communicated to the tested individual or its caregivers on the spot. 31 (The bias of HemoCue 301 anaemia assessments compared with laboratory tests is with 0.25 g/dL well below the WHO recommended threshold for point-of-care machines.) According to the WHO and the Indian Council of Medical Research definitions, a pregnant woman is anaemic if her Hb concentration falls below 11.0 g/dL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study reported high sensitivity for both digital hemoglobinometers (Device A – 81% and Device B 301 – 83%) as compared with the gold standard hematology analyzer. In contrast, studies have reported high sensitivity of 82.1%[ 15 ] and 89.4%[ 11 ] for Device A, but varied sensitivity for device B (23.1%,[ 13 ] 68.7%,[ 7 ] 72%,[ 14 ] and 90%[ 16 ]). However, similar to sensitivity, Device B (86%) had relatively higher sensitivity compared to Device A (79%) in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 14 15 ] The reported specificity for Device A was 63.6%[ 11 ] and 77.9%[ 15 ] and Device B was 72.1%–100%. [ 6 13 14 16 17 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%