Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies

Koltsov, Jayme; Greenfield, Stephen; Soukup, Dylan S.; Hương, Trần Thu; Ellis, Scott J.

doi:10.1177/1071100717709573

Cited by 44 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…13 Assessment of the PROMIS PF CAT was performed by its developers and independent groups with similar results. Cohorts included patients who underwent treatment for hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, hammertoe, ankle arthritis, flatfoot, talar dome lesions, ankle instability, and trauma 12,13,16,21,26,33 ; however generalizability of results to specific populations has been raised as a concern. The PROMIS PF CAT is comparable or superior to legacy clinical scales, including the AOFAS Clinical Rating Scores, Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) with regards to validity, reliability, and responsiveness.…”

Section: Promismentioning

confidence: 99%

AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Outcome measures evaluate various aspects of patient health, and when appropriately utilized can provide valuable information in both clinical practice and research settings. The orthopedic community has placed increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, recognizing their value for understanding patients' perspectives of treatment outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes are information directly reported by patients regarding their perceptions of health, quality of life, or functional status without interpretation by healthcare providers. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) supports the use of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to assess patient general health, functional status, and outcomes of treatment. It is not possible to recommend a single instrument to collect quality orthopedic data as the selection is dependent on the population being examined and the question being asked. We support the use of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (PF CAT) or Lower Extremity Computerized Adaptive Test (LE CAT), which can be assessed with other domains such as Pain Interference. In addition, a disease-specific measure can be used when available.

show abstract

Section: Promismentioning

confidence: 99%

AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The survey's unique algorithm has allowed for a timely collection of clinical data compared to legacy outcome measures. [1][2][3] Since the introduction of PROMIS, multiple domains have been created to assess physical, mental, or social health. In relation to spine surgery, the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) domain has been particularly valuable due to its ability to accurately evaluate strength, mobility, and coordination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Postoperative Mental Health Outcomes in Patients Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the relationship of preoperative physical function, as measured by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), to improvement in mental health, as evaluated by Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: Patients undergoing primary ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified based on preoperative PROMIS PF scores. PROMIS PF cohorts were tested for an association with demographic characteristics and perioperative variables using chi-square analysis and multivariate linear regression. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the association between PROMIS PF cohorts and improvement in SF-12 MCS. Results: A total of 129 one-to 3-level ACDF patients were included: 73 had PROMIS PF < 40 ("low PROMIS") and 56 had PROMIS PF ≥ 40 ("high PROMIS"). The low PROMIS cohort reported worse mental health preoperatively and at all postoperative timepoints except for 1 year. Both cohorts had similar changes in mental health from baseline through the 6-month follow-up. However, at 1 year. postoperatively, the low PROMIS cohort had a statistically greater change in mental health score. Conclusion: Patients with worse preoperative physical function reported significantly worse preoperative and postoperative mental health. However, patients with worse preoperative physical function made significantly greater improvements in mental health from baseline. This suggests that patients with worse preoperative physical function can still expect significant improvements in mental health following surgery.

show abstract

“…PROMIS has proven to be effective in rapid evaluation of outcomes and reduce the burden of patients who complete the questionnaires due to its unique computer adaptive testing algorithm [12,28]. PROMIS have been increasingly adopted in orthopedic and spine conditions to capture patient-centered indicators of health status for use in clinical care, research, and cost-effectiveness analysis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. When compared to traditional surveys, PROMIS provides a more e cient and accurate way reporting patient symptoms, function, and healthrelated quality of life [5,6,12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PROMIS have been increasingly adopted in orthopedic and spine conditions to capture patient-centered indicators of health status for use in clinical care, research, and cost-effectiveness analysis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. When compared to traditional surveys, PROMIS provides a more e cient and accurate way reporting patient symptoms, function, and healthrelated quality of life [5,6,12]. Among these, the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) domain can particularly re ect the strength, range of motion and coordination of patients, so it provides utility in evaluation of postoperative function of patients with spine conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Preoperative Psychological States on Postoperative Outcomes Following Percutaneous Kyphoplasty(PKP)

Yang

Wang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Background: Psychological disorder is widespread in patients with spinal conditions. There is limited investigation into the association between preoperative psychological symptoms(PPS) and postoperative outcomes following percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) in patients suffered osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF) . Methods: This is a retrospective study performed on 224 patients undergoing PKP due to OVCF. Patients are divided into two cohorts base on preoperative psychological states described by Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA). Pre- and postoperative physical function were evaluated by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function(PROMIS PF), and Visual Analogue Scales(VAS) was used to to evaluate patients' back pain. Multiple linear regression model was used to investigate the association between preoperative psychological symptoms and postoperative outcomes.Results: 133(59.4%) patients have PPS, manifested as HAMD score ≥7 and/or HAMA score＞7. Patients with PPS have significantly worse PROMIS PF scores preoperatively (26.6±7.6 vs. 34.2±6.9, p=0.000), as well as within 6 monthes postoperatively, 1-week (31.1±6.5 vs. 37.4±7.2, p=0.000), 1-month (35.3±6.2 vs. 41.1±7.4, p=0.023), 3-months (38.5±8.3 vs. 45.8±8.5, p=0.005), and 6-months (42.8±8.0 vs. 51.2±9.1, p=0.000). Patients with PPS have higher VAS scores preoperatively(8.3±1.6 vs. 6.9±1.9, p=0.001), as well as within 1 month following operation, 1-week (6.2±1.7 vs. 4.1±1.2, p=0.000), 1-month (4.0±1.1 vs. 2.5±1.0, p=0.015).Conclusion: Psychological symptoms are widespread in OVCF patients undergoing PKP. Patients with poor preoperative psychological states not only demonstrated worse preoperative physical function and back pain, but also continued to have significantly worse postoperative outcomes.

show abstract

Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies

Abstract: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Cited by 44 publications

References 16 publications

AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Evaluation of Postoperative Mental Health Outcomes in Patients Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

The Influence of Preoperative Psychological States on Postoperative Outcomes Following Percutaneous Kyphoplasty(PKP)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About