2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of OpenFOAM numerical methods and turbulence models for incompressible bluff body flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in agreement with experimental data [11] [12]. Several other studies in the literature have demonstrated OpenFOAM's effectiveness in modeling complex configurations [13] [14]. In acoustics, in addition to de Villiers' work, Olivier's work [15] addressed the noise of the trailing edge of NACA 0012.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results are in agreement with experimental data [11] [12]. Several other studies in the literature have demonstrated OpenFOAM's effectiveness in modeling complex configurations [13] [14]. In acoustics, in addition to de Villiers' work, Olivier's work [15] addressed the noise of the trailing edge of NACA 0012.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…OpenFOAM-4.1 is an open-source MPI based finite volume CFD toolbox. In an earlier study, Robertson et al [44] verified and validated OpenFOAM's numerical methods and turbulence models for incompressible, single phase bluff-body flows, which involved flow over a sphere, a backward facing step, and a sharp leading-edge delta wing. Robertson et al determined that a 2 nd order implicit backward scheme was optimal for the time discretization; and a 2 nd -order linear upwind and blended 2 nd -order bounded central difference schemes are most efficient for URANS and DES simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenFOAM simulations required a smaller time step, i.e., CFL < 2, for stability. In addition, OpenFOAM is more sensitive to grid topology than Ansys/Fluent and requires meshes with non-orthogonality (angle between the line connecting cell centers and face normal vector) less than 65 • to avoid instability in the pressure solution [44]. Highly non-orthogonal grids usually appear in the corners (at the intersection of the pin and the blade and/or hub) and were avoided by using a smaller near-wall grid spacing, as discussed in Section 4.2.…”
Section: Solution Parameters and High Performance Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pimpleFoam code was selected as the computational solver. The reliability of the solver was tested previously [18,19]. The SSTDES model derived from the SST k-ω model was used to solve the Navier-Stokes equations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%