2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007jd008988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column densities using direct‐Sun mode Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Abstract: [1] This paper presents a comparison of NO 2 data measured with the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board the EOS-AURA satellite with ground-based direct-Sun Brewer measurement data. Since its deployment in July 2004, OMI has provided more than 2 years of daily high-resolution ($13 Â 24 km 2 at nadir) NO 2 vertical column density maps. We describe the retrieval, which includes an estimation of the stratospheric and tropospheric fraction of total NO 2 columns, the air mass factor (AMF) correction based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…February, April and May of 2010. In most of the months, the error bars of OMI data, either within 15 km or within 50 km, do not overlap with the LP-DOAS data, which indicated that there are some unknown systematic errors either in the OMI retrieval (Wenig et al, 2008) or the VCDs to ground level mixing ratios conversion, or both. One possible reason for the lower OMI values over Hong Kong compared to the LP-DOAS measurements is that the OMI a-priori profile used for converting the tropospheric NO 2 VCDs to ground level mixing ratios is averaged over a large area around the Pearl River Delta Region including large fractions of ocean and rural area with lower relative ground level mixing ratio.…”
Section: Cloud Filteringmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…February, April and May of 2010. In most of the months, the error bars of OMI data, either within 15 km or within 50 km, do not overlap with the LP-DOAS data, which indicated that there are some unknown systematic errors either in the OMI retrieval (Wenig et al, 2008) or the VCDs to ground level mixing ratios conversion, or both. One possible reason for the lower OMI values over Hong Kong compared to the LP-DOAS measurements is that the OMI a-priori profile used for converting the tropospheric NO 2 VCDs to ground level mixing ratios is averaged over a large area around the Pearl River Delta Region including large fractions of ocean and rural area with lower relative ground level mixing ratio.…”
Section: Cloud Filteringmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This gridding scheme can also enhance the details in the gridded product by giving smaller OMI pixels higher weights (Wenig et al, 2008). …”
Section: Gridded Omi No 2 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effects in the calculation of the total columns of SO 2 and NO 2 are not discussed, because uncertainties from other sources are much higher due to the usually small column amounts (the order of a few DU) of these species (Fioletov et al, 1998;Wenig et al, 2008). Errors in DT are also expected to affect the results of different diagnostic tests in the Brewer, such as the measured intensity of the internal lamps and the determination of the transmittance of the ND filters, which in turn may affect the accuracy of the final products.…”
Section: Effects Of Dead Time On the Uncertainties Of The Final Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent comparisons of tropospheric NO 2 columns from the OMI standard product (Version 1.0.0) with observations reveal a low bias of 14% versus an ensemble of aircraft measurements , of 25% versus Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard [Wenig et al, 2008], and of 15-30% versus a suite of ground-based remote sensing and aircraft measurements . All three manuscripts describe concerns with their data sets that motivate additional validation activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%