2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-017-0446-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of numerical solvers for liquid metal flow in a complex geometry in the presence of a strong magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The V&V procedure of the RELAP5 MHD module involves the comparison of the results deduced by the code with those of direct numerical simulation tools and data obtained by experimental works. Notable examples of V&V for MHD numerical solvers are found in References [46][47][48][49][50]. At first, simple test cases are employed to verify the response of the program in terms of magnetohydrodynamic pressure drops, either for 2D and 3D phenomena, thus testing the reproduction of a single MHD phenomenon separately.…”
Section: Verification and Validation (Vandv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V&V procedure of the RELAP5 MHD module involves the comparison of the results deduced by the code with those of direct numerical simulation tools and data obtained by experimental works. Notable examples of V&V for MHD numerical solvers are found in References [46][47][48][49][50]. At first, simple test cases are employed to verify the response of the program in terms of magnetohydrodynamic pressure drops, either for 2D and 3D phenomena, thus testing the reproduction of a single MHD phenomenon separately.…”
Section: Verification and Validation (Vandv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five test cases were proposed, including MHD fully developed, 3D flows, and flows with heat transfer. In the framework of this campaign, several comparisons between the codes were performed recently [97,98] to qualify these codes as a potential design and analysis tool for blanket applications.…”
Section: Full Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a decent number of studies [62,[112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119] of prototypical manifold-like MHD flows that varied in flow geometry (flows with expansions or contractions, and with and without the parallel channels), wall electrical conductivity (electrically conducting versus insulating walls), magnetic field direction (geometry changes are either in the plane perpendicular or parallel to the magnetic field) and range of flow parameters (various Ha and Re numbers). Additionally, there are several studies for flows in a U-bend [97,[120][121][122][123]. In the full 3D computations, the Hartmann number was typically limited to several hundreds, rarely to a few thousands, while the Reynolds number was set at several thousands or less.…”
Section: Full Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of energy equations such as (4) to the radial heat conduction within channel walls will generally require appropriate heat transfer coefficients enabling mean wall temperature, mean wall heat flux and bulk temperature to be related, similar to the non-MHD case. A key difference with the MHD cases considered here is that the heat transfer effects of the distorted flow profile and possibly inhomogeneous wall heating is insufficiently well characterized by an expression such as (3). For H 1 cases, the underlying assumption is that the wall thermal conductivity is very large such that there is negligible variation in the specified wall temperature T w around the periphery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The simulation of such flows and their related heat transfer processes is important for the realisation of viable fusion blanket designs. Detailed magnetohydrodynamic CFD is able, in principle, to simulate many of these processes, but at great computational expense [3,4]. As a result, the simulation by such means, of whole fusion blanket plant networks in a range of steady state and transient conditions is well beyond current and foreseeable computational capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%