2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2007.01331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of multi-frequency inversion method by using dummy scatterers of zooplankton

Abstract: High-and multi-frequency acoustic measurement systems and the multi-frequency inversion (MFI) method have been used to measure spatial distributions and abundances of zooplankton by size. In this study, the calibration method for high-and multi-frequency systems was developed and the validation of MFI method was carried out by scatterer measurement. The standard sphere calibration method that has not been applied to such high-and multi-frequencies was applied to calibrate our high-and multi-frequency system, T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being able to separate acoustic backscatter and acoustic attenuation from the recorded signal in rivers is also a great source of information on acoustic processes. This can be achieved in rivers through several means, including horizontal deployment or use of targets of known backscatter such as a tungsten carbide sphere (Foote & Martini, 2010; Hwang et al., 2007) or riverbed echo previously recorded in clear water conditions (Thorne et al., 1995). Exploring the frequency backscatter response of the water column using a larger set of single frequency sonars (but not just a few uncalibrated ADCPs) or broadband sonars following the techniques under development in oceanography (e.g., Stanton et al., 2010) is another very promising field of research to potentially identify and separate different sources of backscatter like flocs or air micro‐bubbles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being able to separate acoustic backscatter and acoustic attenuation from the recorded signal in rivers is also a great source of information on acoustic processes. This can be achieved in rivers through several means, including horizontal deployment or use of targets of known backscatter such as a tungsten carbide sphere (Foote & Martini, 2010; Hwang et al., 2007) or riverbed echo previously recorded in clear water conditions (Thorne et al., 1995). Exploring the frequency backscatter response of the water column using a larger set of single frequency sonars (but not just a few uncalibrated ADCPs) or broadband sonars following the techniques under development in oceanography (e.g., Stanton et al., 2010) is another very promising field of research to potentially identify and separate different sources of backscatter like flocs or air micro‐bubbles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its popularity in plankton research [10], the acoustic monitoring, especially ultrasonic monitoring, has not been widely adopted to monitor microalgae. Considering the size of zooplankton and phytoplankton, Frisk and Hays, Holliday and Pieper, Hwang et al [11][12][13] select proper frequency bands between 25kHz and 25MHz for ultrasonic tests, and perform computations based on the volumetric scattering and equivalent radius of sound. Taking millimeter-scale krill and planktonic algae for instance, the abundance and distribution of these zooplankton and phytoplankton were estimated through the analysis on morphological and acoustic physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is almost impossible under in situ conditions. Therefore, ex situ experiments using fish aggregations in cages 1) and dummy scatters [2][3][4] have ever been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%