2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:nhaz.0000007201.80743.fc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Landslide Susceptibility Maps; Examples and Applications from a Case Study in Northern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
139
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
139
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The area under the curve (AUROC) varies between 0.5 and 1.0, with higher values indicating a better fit of the model. The model is validated by comparing it to a landslide dataset that is not used for calibrating the model [30,31]. The subdivision of the landslide data into the training and validation parts is generally performed randomly or using non-overlapping temporal or spatial subsets of the landslide inventory [30].…”
Section: Validation Of Susceptibility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under the curve (AUROC) varies between 0.5 and 1.0, with higher values indicating a better fit of the model. The model is validated by comparing it to a landslide dataset that is not used for calibrating the model [30,31]. The subdivision of the landslide data into the training and validation parts is generally performed randomly or using non-overlapping temporal or spatial subsets of the landslide inventory [30].…”
Section: Validation Of Susceptibility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a coarse DEM resolution could be of poor quality in some cases, the gain in the quality of the results would not be worth the efforts (Remondo, et al, 2003b). Given the dimensions of the shallow landslide and debris flows in the study area, a 10 m×10 m DEM could be optimal for analysing the landslide source and runout susceptibility (Tarolli and Tarboton, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to obtain two independent failure samples the study area was divided into a training zone and a test zone (Fig. 3), following the approach of Baeza and Corominas (2001), Remondo et al (2003b and Guinau et al (2005).…”
Section: Terrain Failure Susceptibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations