2015
DOI: 10.3390/rs70607846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Land Cover Products Using Reliability Evaluation Methods

Abstract: Validation of land cover products is a fundamental task prior to data applications. Current validation schemes and methods are, however, suited only for assessing classification accuracy and disregard the reliability of land cover products. The reliability evaluation of land cover products should be undertaken to provide reliable land cover information. In addition, the lack of high-quality reference data often constrains validation and affects the reliability results of land cover products. This study propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the CD results were evaluated by the following four widely used indices: 1) false alarm (FA) rate, 2) missed detection (MD) rate, 3) total error (TE) rate, and 4) Kappa coefficient [62][63][64].…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria and Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the CD results were evaluated by the following four widely used indices: 1) false alarm (FA) rate, 2) missed detection (MD) rate, 3) total error (TE) rate, and 4) Kappa coefficient [62][63][64].…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria and Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the boundary of the extracted object cannot be strictly the same as that of the reference due to the error propagation during image interpretation. This phenomenon reduces the feasibility of using Equation (15). To improve the flexibility of B D , a tolerance is set to judge if the two objects are identical.…”
Section: Distance-based Accuracy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise is inherent in satellite images, and thus, the accuracy of object extraction needs to be examined. This issue has received considerable critical attention [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Examples include the error matrix and confusion matrix, which are two typical methods for accuracy assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the amount of uncertainty in existing LUC mapping information significantly impairs the reliability of classification products [5]. Researchers developing methods of measuring the uncertainty in LUC data focused on quantifying the uncertainty in remote sensing images, determining the classification uncertainty, and assessing the accuracy of LUC products [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For example, Griffith and Chun [7] studied the uncertainty in spatial autocorrelation parameters in a spatial autoregressive model associated with remotely sensed images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%