2004
DOI: 10.1080/01490410490889049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Jason-1 Nadir Ionosphere TEC Using GEONET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jason satellite carries similar instrumentation. Jason nadirdirected TEC intercompares closely with that measured by TOPEX (Ping et al, 2004). The TOPEX and Jason observations of vertical TEC over the oceans provide complementary data sets to the land-based GPS TEC data.…”
Section: Jason/topex Tecmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Jason satellite carries similar instrumentation. Jason nadirdirected TEC intercompares closely with that measured by TOPEX (Ping et al, 2004). The TOPEX and Jason observations of vertical TEC over the oceans provide complementary data sets to the land-based GPS TEC data.…”
Section: Jason/topex Tecmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It is shown in [35] that the TEC calculated by the IRI model systematically exceeds the TEC obtained from the "Jason-1" data by 0.33 TECU for a standard deviation of about 10 TECU. However, in that paper the TEC were calculated by the IRI model for up to the orbit height of the satellites, and after that the TEC above the satellite orbit at an altitude of up to 2000 km was estimated (unfortunately, the estimation procedure is not given in that paper) and the model values of TEC were corrected by this magnitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, the difference between the I GMT values according to the "Topex"/"Poseidon" and "Jason-1" data is significantly (statistically) varied in time, but a dispersion analysis shows that the time dependence is not so important for improvement of the error model. It is shown in [35] that according to the "Topex"/"Poseidon" and "Jason-1" data, the TEC has a systematic deviation of about 1.4 TECU. However, it is mentioned there that this estimate is statistically insignificant.…”
Section: International Reference Ionosphere (Iri) Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the additional products resulting from this mission is the TEC V , which is computed along the satellite track with a 1 Hz sampling rate from the ionospheric range correction and includes the electron density up to the altitude of 1,336 km. The Jason TEC V has been previously shown to have a positive bias (Ping et al 2004 andWilson 2007). Figure 16, which plots the Jason TEC V as a function of latitude, shows a (2007) between the Jason TEC V and TEC V extending out to GPS satellite altitudes.…”
Section: Tec Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%