2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of immunoassay for protein biomarkers: Bioanalytical study plan implementation to support pre-clinical and clinical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
125
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
125
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes preanalytic effects associated with the collection and handling (including storage) of samples and analytical variability arising from the methodology, instrumentation, and also technical skills 18, 21, 22. This aspect becomes especially important for the clinician when utilizing patient‐side (ie, in‐house) diagnostic tests 23.…”
Section: Biomarker Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes preanalytic effects associated with the collection and handling (including storage) of samples and analytical variability arising from the methodology, instrumentation, and also technical skills 18, 21, 22. This aspect becomes especially important for the clinician when utilizing patient‐side (ie, in‐house) diagnostic tests 23.…”
Section: Biomarker Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect becomes especially important for the clinician when utilizing patient‐side (ie, in‐house) diagnostic tests 23. Important variables that are determined for the preanalytical validation of a biomarker assay include the lower detection limit of the assay, assay sensitivity, dilutional parallelism and linearity, assay accuracy, precision, and reproducibility 14, 21. In addition, quality assurance of a biomarker test requires that a quality control program be in place 22, 23…”
Section: Biomarker Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All were within a generally acceptable range (<10% for the intra-assay CV and <15% for the inter-assay CV) [25,26]. We therefore concluded that the PS K196E ELISA system can discriminate KE samples from KK samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The validation experiments were performed according to ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 5725-2, ISO 5725-4 criteria and the validation protocol was devised with reference to several supporting guidance publications [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Six laboratories located in Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Finland and Ireland took part in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linearity of dilution It is important to be able to demonstrate that if the concentration of a protein of interest is above the ULOQ of an assay that it can be diluted, without affecting accuracy of measurement, to a concentration within the working range of the assay 34 . Linearity of dilution was suboptimal in these experiments as 30% of dilutions were outside the pre-defined acceptance range.…”
Section: Recovery (Selectivity)mentioning
confidence: 99%