2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of GOSAT and OCO-2 against In Situ Aircraft Measurements and Comparison with CarbonTracker and GEOS-Chem over Qinhuangdao, China

Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most important greenhouse gas and several satellites have been launched to monitor the atmospheric CO2 at regional and global scales. Evaluation of the measurements obtained from these satellites against accurate and precise instruments is crucial. In this work, aircraft measurements of CO2 were carried out over Qinhuangdao, China (39.9354°N, 119.6005°E), on 14, 16, and 19 March 2019 to validate the Greenhous gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different datasets cannot be processed directly because of their differences in terms of spatial and temporal resolutions [38,39]. For instance, the ESI data were retrieved from SERVIR Global and data from the MODIS sensor aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, but both have different resolutions, which cause mismatching of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different datasets cannot be processed directly because of their differences in terms of spatial and temporal resolutions [38,39]. For instance, the ESI data were retrieved from SERVIR Global and data from the MODIS sensor aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, but both have different resolutions, which cause mismatching of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets with different resolutions cannot be directly processed together [66][67][68][69]. All datasets other than GLDAS and GRACE were aggregated spatially at 1 • by 1 • resolution before standardization in order to maintain uniformity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite-based observations are sensitive to clouds and aerosols; therefore, many of the data are discarded during preprocessing due to the presence of clouds and aerosols (Mustafa et al, 2021b). Figure 3a and b show the quantity of XCO 2 retrievals from 2015 to 2019 on a spatial grid of 0.5 • × 0.5 • (latitude × longitude) over West and East Asia, respectively.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Xco 2 Observations and Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%