2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products over croplands in northeastern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the comparison at a spatial resolution of 3 km shows similar product accuracy (just slightly better) to that at a resolution of 300 m. The accuracy of Collection 300 m V1 is similar to that of the other reference satellite 1 km products for LAI and improved for fAPAR. All the satellite products show large overestimations for the Albufera rice crop site during the early and growing periods of development (June-July), and this result was previously observed for LAI products by Campos-Taberner et al [68] and by Fang et al [69] for rice crops in China. Satellite retrieval algorithms misinterpret the decreased reflectance due to strong water absorption as a denser canopy (i.e., increasing artificially LAI, fAPAR and fCOVER values).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Indeed, the comparison at a spatial resolution of 3 km shows similar product accuracy (just slightly better) to that at a resolution of 300 m. The accuracy of Collection 300 m V1 is similar to that of the other reference satellite 1 km products for LAI and improved for fAPAR. All the satellite products show large overestimations for the Albufera rice crop site during the early and growing periods of development (June-July), and this result was previously observed for LAI products by Campos-Taberner et al [68] and by Fang et al [69] for rice crops in China. Satellite retrieval algorithms misinterpret the decreased reflectance due to strong water absorption as a denser canopy (i.e., increasing artificially LAI, fAPAR and fCOVER values).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The most likely explanation for the low model efficiency of predictions driven by corrected MODIS LAI is the uncertainty of MODIS LAI itself. Many previous studies have pointed to a large underestimation of LAI by the MODIS product, compared to LAI values measured in situ (Fang et al, 2019;Fu et al, 2016;Sharp et al, 2018), with multiple causes (Yang et al, 2007). In addition, remote sensing of LAI in croplands suffers from specific problems due to their fragmented distribution and close association with settlements.…”
Section: Prediction Of Ab and Yield Variationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Leaf area index (LAI) is defined as one half the total green leaf area per unit horizontal ground surface area (Chen and Black 1992), is one of the basic climate variables defined by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). LAI determines the effective cross-section of the interaction between the earth and atmosphere and is an important biophysical parameter in vegetation growth monitoring (Jin et al 2016;Fang et al 2019b;Song et al 2020), global climate change (Martin et al 2016;Tao, Chen, and Fu 2020) and land surface process models (Chaney, Metcalfe, and Wood 2016;Xie et al 2019). In order to run largescale ecosystem models, we need regional and even global LAI data (Myneni et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation networks usually include flat and relatively homogeneous surfaces, such as the Benchmark Land Multisite Analysis and Inter-comparison of Products (BELMANIP) (Baret et al 2006), BigFoot (Cohen et al 2006), Validation Network for Remote-Sensing Products in China (VRPC) (Ma et al 2015), and Implementing Multi-Scale Agricultural Indicators Exploiting Sentinels (FP7/ImagineS) (Camacho et al 2014). In previous studies, data from these validation networks have been used to validate MODIS, VEGETATION, GLASS, and GEOV1 LAI products under various conditions of land cover types and environment (Claverie et al 2013;Cohen et al 2006;Fang, Wei, and Liang 2012;Pisek and Chen 2007;Jin et al 2017;Stern, Doraiswamy, and Hunt 2014;Yang et al 2017;Fang et al 2019b;Hu et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%