2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of epilepsy diagnoses in the Danish National Hospital Register

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
153
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
153
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, validation studies have shown high quality in diagnoses of febrile seizure, epilepsy, and ADHD obtained in these Danish registers. We found that the predictive value of a febrile seizure diagnosis was 93%, 41 the value of an epilepsy diagnosis was 81%, 42 and the value of an ADHD diagnosis was 84%. 43 We did not include data on diagnoses from private practices (only from public hospital departments).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, validation studies have shown high quality in diagnoses of febrile seizure, epilepsy, and ADHD obtained in these Danish registers. We found that the predictive value of a febrile seizure diagnosis was 93%, 41 the value of an epilepsy diagnosis was 81%, 42 and the value of an ADHD diagnosis was 84%. 43 We did not include data on diagnoses from private practices (only from public hospital departments).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Analysis of subtypes of epilepsy was not performed because of the relatively low number of such subtypes in DNHR and because of insufficient discriminate validity of subtype diagnoses of epilepsy in the register. 42 Patients were assigned to the epilepsy group at first onset of epilepsy, regardless of subtype. Furthermore, we did not examine the effect of repeated admissions due to epilepsy or a possible dose-response effect in the association.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the diagnoses in the registry has been studied for several diseases (eg, epilepsy, asthma, and febrile seizures, with positive predictive values of 81%, 85%, and 93%, respectively). [20][21][22][23][24] Diagnoses, based on the Danish version of the ICD-10, 25 were classified into dichotomous diagnostic categories according to chapters 1 to 17 of the ICD-10. In addition, we used as outcome a dichotomous overall category ("any disease"), indicating whether any disease of any diagnostic category was present (see also refs 26 and 27).…”
Section: Child Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 A study in Denmark (a country with similar national register-based health care to Sweden) found a positive predictive value for epilepsy of 81% and for any seizure disorder of 89%. 22 According to the Danish validation study of the ICD codes for different specific epilepsies in Health Care Registers, their predictive value is low in the subgroups. 22 The occurrence of the specific epilepsy diagnosis varied in different studies of individuals with ASD and comorbid epilepsy, primarily generalized between 14% and 24%, partial onset between 30% and 44%, and the dominating group had unspecified epilepsy (G40.9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 According to the Danish validation study of the ICD codes for different specific epilepsies in Health Care Registers, their predictive value is low in the subgroups. 22 The occurrence of the specific epilepsy diagnosis varied in different studies of individuals with ASD and comorbid epilepsy, primarily generalized between 14% and 24%, partial onset between 30% and 44%, and the dominating group had unspecified epilepsy (G40.9). 6,9,23 We have therefore not analyzed the different epilepsy codes separately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%