2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of elastic cross section models for space radiation applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 282 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, total fragmentation cross section models can be used for normalizing and anchoring parametric models, such as DDFRG [12,13,119]. Werneth et al [146][147][148][149][150] developed a relativistic (kinematics) multiple scattering theory (RMST) for the prediction of reaction, elastic, total, and elastic differential cross sections for space radiation-relevant reactions. The fundamental nuclear constituents of the MST are defined as the nucleons, and the quark structure of individual nucleons is not considered.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, total fragmentation cross section models can be used for normalizing and anchoring parametric models, such as DDFRG [12,13,119]. Werneth et al [146][147][148][149][150] developed a relativistic (kinematics) multiple scattering theory (RMST) for the prediction of reaction, elastic, total, and elastic differential cross sections for space radiation-relevant reactions. The fundamental nuclear constituents of the MST are defined as the nucleons, and the quark structure of individual nucleons is not considered.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting result is that relativistic kinematic effects will depend on both energy and relative mass of the projectile and target [148]. A comprehensive validation effort [149] showed that the FIGURE 20 | Experimental data of total reaction cross sections for 4 Heinduced reactions on 237 Np targets, compared with two different parameterizations. The parameterizations shown are by Tripathi et al [109] with the modifications described by Horst et al [43] and the parameterization by Shen et al [110] with the modifications proposed by Sihver et al [111].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%