Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis

Abstract

Aims: Digital pathology (DP) offers advantages over glass slide microscopy (GS), but data demonstrating a statistically valid equivalent (i.e. non-inferior) performance of DP against GS are required to permit its use in diagnosis. The aim of this study is to provide evidence of non-inferiority. Methods and results: Seventeen pathologists rereported 3017 cases by DP. Of these, 1009 were re-reported by the same pathologist, and 2008 by a different pathologist. Re-examination of 10 138 scanned slides (2.22 terabytes) produced 72 variances between GS and DP reports, including 21 clinically significant variances. Ground truth lay with GS in 12 cases and with DP in nine cases. These results are within the 95% confidence interval for existing intraobserver and interobserver variability, proving that DP is non-inferior to GS. In three cases, the digital platform was deemed to be responsible for the variance, including a gastric biopsy, where Helicobacter pylori only became visible on slides scanned at the 960 setting, and a bronchial biopsy and penile biopsy, where dysplasia was reported on DP but was not present on GS. Conclusions: This is one of the largest studies proving that DP is equivalent to GS for the diagnosis of histopathology specimens. Error rates are similar in both platforms, although some problems e.g. detection of bacteria, are predictable.

A Systematic Analysis of Discordant Diagnoses in Digital Pathology Compared With Light Microscopy

“…Many authors found diagnostic biopsies, particularly where detection of inflammatory disease is important, were best scanned at 340, with Snead et al 35 recommending 360 in cases where detection of microorganisms is a priority.…”

Conventional Microscopical versus Digital Whole-Slide Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Thin-Layer Cervical Specimens: A Validation Study

“…[1234567] One of the objectives of viewing scanned whole slides from histological or cytological specimen is remote exchange of knowledge and expertise of professionals to increase diagnostic accuracy. [12689] As a result of the increased implementation of WSI in research applications and clinical practice, guidelines for validation of WSI for use in primary diagnostics of histological specimens were recently proposed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP).…”

“…Several studies aimed at the validation of the use of WSI in primary diagnostics of histological specimens. [135101415161718] However, only a few studies have investigated the use of WSI in primary diagnostics of cytological specimens[8192021222324] and compared this with the performance of the local diagnostic team on conventional glass slides. One recent study used the CAP guideline for the validation of WSI in primary diagnostics of pediatric cytopathology.…”

Simultaneous automatic scoring and co‐registration of hormone receptors in tumor areas in whole slide images of breast cancer tissue slides

“…The adoption of digital whole slide imaging for the analysis of histopathology slides (often referred to as digital pathology) presents novel opportunities for improving and increasing efficiency of the way pathologists work 1 . The increasing disease burden presented by the elderly population and escalating costs of treatment place growing demands on many clinical services to provide more for less, improvements in efficiency may prove to be key in achieving this goal.…”