2019
DOI: 10.3390/technologies7040068
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The measurement of the center of pressure (CoP) is one of the most frequently used quantitative methods for quantifying postural performance. Due to the complexity and the high biological variability of the postural control loop, a large number of different methods and parameters have been established to describe the CoP process. Furthermore, the methodological conditions such as the foot position, visual condition, sampling duration, and the data processing also have a relevant influence on the measurement re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency was not significantly different in the post-hoc test, but we found that the frequency of postural sway fell in 0.5–1.5 Hz for COM, and from cluster 3, CH subjects of lower age and lower days after onset kept their sway frequencies within 0.6–0.7 Hz. A previous researcher found that frequency of body sway fell in the range of 0.1–0.2 Hz (Koltermann et al, 2019 ), and because they also found that post-stroke increases sway frequency (Mizrahi et al, 1989 ), our finding was found to be reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Frequency was not significantly different in the post-hoc test, but we found that the frequency of postural sway fell in 0.5–1.5 Hz for COM, and from cluster 3, CH subjects of lower age and lower days after onset kept their sway frequencies within 0.6–0.7 Hz. A previous researcher found that frequency of body sway fell in the range of 0.1–0.2 Hz (Koltermann et al, 2019 ), and because they also found that post-stroke increases sway frequency (Mizrahi et al, 1989 ), our finding was found to be reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The data was filtered with a Butterworth filter of the 3rd order with a cut-off frequency of 14.3 Hz. The filter was designed according to Koltermann et al, 2019 [17].…”
Section: Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%