2014
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.110452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of cytogenetic risk groups according to International Prognostic Scoring Systems by peripheral blood CD34+FISH: results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group

Abstract: ABSTRACTentire chromosome complement to detect numerical as well as structural aberrations. Most chromosomal aberrations in MDS can also be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, but only pre-defined anomalies can be covered, if a distinct informative probe is used.9

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of cells with LOY was determined by FISH analysis using commercially available DNA probes specific for chromosomes X and Y (CEP X SpectrumOrange™/Y SpectrumGreen™, Abbott GmbH & Company, KG, Wiesbaden, Germany). Further commercially available DNA probes were used to screen CD34+ peripheral blood cells of MDS patients for the most frequent cytogenetic aberrations detectable in MDS patients as described before (Braulke et al, , ). A case was considered positive for LOY if this abnormality was observed in at least three metaphases by banding analysis or if the percentage of cells with LOY exceeded our laboratory threshold of 7.5% for LOY in CD34+ peripheral blood cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of cells with LOY was determined by FISH analysis using commercially available DNA probes specific for chromosomes X and Y (CEP X SpectrumOrange™/Y SpectrumGreen™, Abbott GmbH & Company, KG, Wiesbaden, Germany). Further commercially available DNA probes were used to screen CD34+ peripheral blood cells of MDS patients for the most frequent cytogenetic aberrations detectable in MDS patients as described before (Braulke et al, , ). A case was considered positive for LOY if this abnormality was observed in at least three metaphases by banding analysis or if the percentage of cells with LOY exceeded our laboratory threshold of 7.5% for LOY in CD34+ peripheral blood cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of an extended panel of fluorescent in situ hybridization probes on PB mononuclear cells enriched for CD34+ although helpful but is limited to identifying only predefined lesions. 16 Our previously published pilot study has shown the utility of molecular assays such as targeted gene sequencing and SNP-A karyotyping, using PB as a surrogate for BM. 17 Following on from this preliminary work, we extended the cohort (n = 201) and have optimized a sequencing gene panel targeting the 24 frequently mutated genes in MDS and a high-resolution SNP array for karyotyping to determine whether genetic abnormalities in the BM are reflected in the PB thus enabling easy assessment of response to treatment and/or disease progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially relevant for bone marrow samples of MDS patients with fibrotic or hypocellular marrows, where chromosome banding of marrow metaphases often fails and cytogenetic information is missing. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with targeted probes can overcome this limitation, as it can identify a subset of cytogenetic abnormalities in patient samples with no or poor morphology metaphases . However, FISH analysis with targeted probe panels is labor intensive and requires the ability to screen a large number of cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%