2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the porcine spine: a comparative study with multidetector computed tomography and anatomical specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thoracic and lumbar segments of each spine were quantitatively analyzed by the same investigator (LB) and the spinal formula recorded. Morphometric analysis of the spine was performed according to established methods [ 11 , 14 , 16 , 17 ]. Area measurements were made of the spinal cord (SC), vertebral body (VB), dural sac (DS), and vertebral canal (VC) at the mid-body and the intervertebral disc space of each spinal segment ( Fig 4 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thoracic and lumbar segments of each spine were quantitatively analyzed by the same investigator (LB) and the spinal formula recorded. Morphometric analysis of the spine was performed according to established methods [ 11 , 14 , 16 , 17 ]. Area measurements were made of the spinal cord (SC), vertebral body (VB), dural sac (DS), and vertebral canal (VC) at the mid-body and the intervertebral disc space of each spinal segment ( Fig 4 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little literature regarding CT myelogram techniques in swine. In one study, multidetector CT, cone-beam CT and MRI were compared for morphometric analysis of Landrace swine cadavers, a domestic commercial breed [ 14 ]. However, CTM techniques and morphometry in miniature swine have not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%