Validation of computer self-administered screening and assessment tools to identify unhealthy substance use in medical patients

McNeely, Jennifer; Strauss, Shiela M.; Cleland, Charles M.; Rotrosen, John; Ramautar, Arianne; Nelsen, Derek; Gourevitch, Marc N.

doi:10.1186/1940-0640-10-s1-a38

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research suggests that the use of informatics tools may improve a provider’s ability to screen for symptoms such as psychosocial distress ( Miller, Mullins, Onukwugha, Golant, & Buzaglo, 2014 ; Wagner et al, 2015 ). Although the use of informatics tools to assess for symptoms is growing across settings ( Baer et al, 2013 ; McNeely et al, 2015 ), there are limited descriptions of self-administered tablets for symptom screening in oncology settings. Cancer Support Community created and evaluated CancerSupportSource (CSS), an innovative web-based program for distress screening that can be administered via Internet or tablet format ( Buzaglo, Zaleta, McManus, Golant, & Miller, 2019 ; Miller et al, 2014 ).…”

Section: Distress Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using a Quality Improvement Model to Implement Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Setting

Bush

Goebel

Hardan-Khalil

et al. 2020

JADPRO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Quality cancer care includes routine screening for psychosocial distress. This quality improvement project focused on the implementation of distress screening at a licensed affiliate of Cancer Support Community, a community-based non-profit organization that provides professionally led cancer support. Methods: An advanced practice oncology nurse assisted the staff in implementing and evaluating the process of distress screening. CancerSupportSource (CSS), a validated web-based distress screening program developed by Cancer Support Community for use in community cancer settings, was employed to screen for distress, identify potential resources, and improve in-house and community referrals. For purposes of this quality improvement project, CSS was administered in interview format by staff. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement approach was used to implement CSS. Results: To implement the practice of distress screening, 21 patient participants were initially screened and evaluated for distress, including risk for clinically significant levels of depression, using CSS. The tool identified participant concerns and flagged thirteen persons as at risk for depression. After implementation and evaluation of distress screening using PDSA, in a year, 51 participants were screened. Participants stated that distress screening allowed for discussion of intimate questions that may not have otherwise occurred in an intake interview. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that CSS identified psychosocial and practical needs, facilitating the referral process and identification of community resources. Application of the PDSA model was an effective quality improvement model that can be used for the implementation and sustainability of distress screening across settings.

show abstract