2013
DOI: 10.1111/pcn.12048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of computer‐administered clinical rating scale: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale assessment with Interactive Voice Response technology – Japanese version

Abstract: Aim:The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) program to rate the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score in Japanese depressive patients.Methods: Depression severity was assessed in 60 patients by a clinician and psychologists using HAM-D. Scoring by the IVR program was conducted on the same and the following days. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity for total HAM-D scores were examined by cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were rated on their manic and depressive symptoms using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) 38 and the GRID Hamilton depression rating scale, 21-item version (HAMD21) 39,40 , respectively. The inter-rater reliability of our HAMD21 scoring was high (correlation coefficient r = 0.91) 41 . Healthy controls had no history of contact with any psychiatric services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The patients were rated on their manic and depressive symptoms using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) 38 and the GRID Hamilton depression rating scale, 21-item version (HAMD21) 39,40 , respectively. The inter-rater reliability of our HAMD21 scoring was high (correlation coefficient r = 0.91) 41 . Healthy controls had no history of contact with any psychiatric services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Subjects were eligible for enrollment in the study if the following criteria were met at the start of the wash-out phase: a diagnosis of MDD based on the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR);6 a total score of ≥20 on the Interactive Voice Response (IVR)710-based Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D; 17 items);11 a total score of ≥25 on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self Report (IDS-SR);12,13 a score of ≥1 on at least four of five items on the five-item subscale of the IDS-SR (items 19, 20, 21, 22, and 30), and a total score of ≥7 on the five-item subscale of the IDS-SR; a Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) score of ≥4 (“Moderately ill” or much worse); a current major depressive episode duration of ≥8 weeks and <24 months; and aged ≥18 and <65 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Earlier computer-based evaluation systems, even before the advent of machine learning, demonstrated efficacy in enhancing the agreement rates by employing algorithms to determine scores via binary decisions. 12 The binary choices of "yes" and "no" are straightforward, yet participants, especially those suffering from depression, might have difficulty in making binary decisions. Digital text presentation can be daunting for those affected by depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%