2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Clinically Relevant Thresholds of Esophagogastric Junction Obstruction Using FLIP Panometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no normal data available for diameter in the situation when the EGJ‐DI is between 2–3 mm 2 /mmHg. However, recent work found that in patients with an EGJ‐DI ≥2.0 mm 2 /mmHg and a maximum EGJ diameter ≥16 mm, 99% had a normal EGJ outflow on high resolution manometry 29 . The 5th percentile of the intrabag pressure was 20.7 and 31.3 mmHg at the 40 and 50 ml fill volumes, respectively, which is above the recommended pressure of 20 mmHg threshold indicated at 60 ml 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are no normal data available for diameter in the situation when the EGJ‐DI is between 2–3 mm 2 /mmHg. However, recent work found that in patients with an EGJ‐DI ≥2.0 mm 2 /mmHg and a maximum EGJ diameter ≥16 mm, 99% had a normal EGJ outflow on high resolution manometry 29 . The 5th percentile of the intrabag pressure was 20.7 and 31.3 mmHg at the 40 and 50 ml fill volumes, respectively, which is above the recommended pressure of 20 mmHg threshold indicated at 60 ml 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, recent work found that in patients with an EGJ-DI ≥2.0 mm 2 /mmHg and a maximum EGJ diameter ≥16 mm, 99% had a normal EGJ outflow on high resolution manometry. 29 The 5th percentile of the intrabag Although there is little discussion about the relevance of an abnormally low EGJ-DI, it remains the question if it makes sense to define an upper limit of normality for EGJ-DI. The 95th percentile for upper limit of EGJ-DI from the meta-analysis was 10.95 mm 2 / mmHg at 40 ml balloon filling and 10.66 mm 2 /mmHg at 50 ml balloon filling, relatively close to the value of 9 mm 2 /mmHg that has been suggested in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLIP panometry findings correlate well with HRM in detecting EGJ obstruction [27 ▪ ], and FLIP can be used to support the manometric diagnosis of EGJOO. One study showed that FLIP revealed an abnormal DI (<2.8 mm 2 /mmHg) in 33 of 38 patients (87%) with EGJOO diagnosed by HRM [22].…”
Section: Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Parameters In Esophagogastr...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1,2 We recently reported a diagnostic approach to classify EGJ opening (that accurately identified EGJ obstruction as defined by high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the Chicago classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0) applying FLIP panometry metrics: the EGJ distensibility index (DI) and maximum EGJ diameter. 3,4 This approach accurately identified EGJ obstruction, as defined by highresolution manometry (HRM) and the CCv4.0, when the FLIP metrics were both distinctly reduced (ie, reduced EGJ opening [REO]), or both distinctly normal (ie, normal EGJ opening). The promise of the FLIP panometry EGJ opening classification was further demonstrated by outperforming HRM to detect esophageal retention on timed barium esophagram (TBE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 However, the FLIP panometry EGJ opening classification left a “middle-ground” classification of borderline EGJ opening (BEO) when the EGJ-DI or maximum EGJ diameter were reduced, but criteria for REO were not met; this was observed in 23% of the study cohort. 3 The BEO classification was associated with less diagnostic certainty and it was recommended that additional complementary testing should be pursued to facilitate reaching an overall clinical impression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%