2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of blade-resolved computational fluid dynamics for a MW-scale turbine rotor in atmospheric flow

Abstract: In this study, simulation results of two different computational fluid dynamics codes, Nalu-Wind and EllipSys3D, are presented for a wind turbine rotor in complex yawed and sheared inflow. The results are compared to measurements from the DanAero experiments, to validate computed pressures and azimuthal trends. Despite different code methodologies and grid setups, the codes agree well in computed pressures and integrated forces along the blade for all blade azimuthal positions, however with some discrepancy in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For BEM aerodynamics, airfoil data are used, obtained during the original DanAero project through wind tunnel tests and corrected for 3D effects; see Bak et al (2006Bak et al ( , 2011. From Grinderslev et al (2021), it is known that the airfoil data do not capture well the 3D effects and predict an earlier stall than seen in CFD or experiments. In this case, however, the BEM calculations are used for initialization only to get good estimate of the initial bending, and for that reason no further corrections to the airfoil data have been conducted.…”
Section: Hawc2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For BEM aerodynamics, airfoil data are used, obtained during the original DanAero project through wind tunnel tests and corrected for 3D effects; see Bak et al (2006Bak et al ( , 2011. From Grinderslev et al (2021), it is known that the airfoil data do not capture well the 3D effects and predict an earlier stall than seen in CFD or experiments. In this case, however, the BEM calculations are used for initialization only to get good estimate of the initial bending, and for that reason no further corrections to the airfoil data have been conducted.…”
Section: Hawc2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, the code was validated in Grinderslev et al (2020b) for the specific case of the present NM80 rotor in atmospheric laminar flow conditions by comparison with the CFD code Nalu-Wind (Sprague et al, 2019) and measurements from the DanAero experiments. Further, the FSI framework was used in Grinderslev et al (2021) to simulate the coupled effects of the DanAero-inspired laminar wind flow and the structural response.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The code has been used extensively for for a range of test cases and was validated in e.g the Mexico project (Bechmann et al, 2011;Sørensen et al, 2016) and for the Phase VI NREL rotor (Sørensen and Schreck, 2014;. Recently, the code was validated in (Grinderslev et al, 2020b) for the specific case of the present NM80 rotor in atmospheric laminar flow conditions by comparison with the CFD code Nalu-Wind (Sprague et al, 2019) and measurements from the DanAero experiments. Further, the FSI framework was used in (Grinderslev et al) to simulate the coupled effects of the DanAero inspired laminar wind flow and the structural response.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%