1995
DOI: 10.1080/01431169508954629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of backscatter models for level and deformed sea-ice in ERS-l SAR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few Baltic Sea ice studies of the σ • behavior in connection with the sea-ice geophysical parameters [11]- [14]. Only in [14] σ • time-series analysis has been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are few Baltic Sea ice studies of the σ • behavior in connection with the sea-ice geophysical parameters [11]- [14]. Only in [14] σ • time-series analysis has been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 1) penetration depth in snow cover estimated from the dielectric constant of snow [15], 2) results of two Baltic Sea ice studies, where measured σ • data have been compared with a theoretical backscattering model [11], [12], and 3) a firstorder radiative-transfer backscattering model [16] (surface scattering with the integral-equation method and volume scattering with Mie phase matrix) for snow-covered sea ice, we determine three coarse snow wetness classes for our C-band HH-polarization σ • data analysis: 1) dry snow (snow volumetric wetness 0%); 2) moist snow (wetness < 2%); and 3) wet snow (wetness > 2%). Under moist-snow condition, the penetration depth in snow decreases rapidly as a function of snow wetness for wetness values below 1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On ice surfaces a thin film of water, such as observed at spring during sunny afternoons, turn ridge blocks into specular reflectors. This allows for an increased contrast between ridges and the snow covered background due to the variability in surface orientations and occurrence of multiple reflection on several faces in ridges (Hudier, 2006;Carlstrom & Ulander, 1995). On the other hand, it can also cause an enhanced forward scattering on snow surfaces, generating dark stripes or low backscattering areas where surface slopes cause the SAR incident beam to reach the snow interface at a large angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected these 3 months for the development and the test work because then the SAR images were mostly acquired under dry snow conditions. Hence, the dominant backscattering source was the sea ice surface and we could expect a statistical relationship between σ o and DIR as reported in Carlström and Ulander (1995); Dierking et al (1999); Similä et al (2001Similä et al ( , 2010; Mäkynen and Hallikainen (2004). The preprocessing of the RS-2 SCWA images consisted of calibration (calculation of σ o HH and σ o HV ), georectification, calculation of the incidence angle θ 0 and land masking.…”
Section: Radarsat-2 Sar Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%