2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-012-0684-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of ApneaLink Ox™ for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ApneaLink was used to collect data regarding SDB since it is a validated, 18,19,44 feasible tool that is easy to use for elderly patients in home-based settings. However, limitations include that it is not extensively used in CHF studies, and it lacks the possibility to distinguish between obstructive and central sleep apnoea, as well as determine sleep onset and awakenings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ApneaLink was used to collect data regarding SDB since it is a validated, 18,19,44 feasible tool that is easy to use for elderly patients in home-based settings. However, limitations include that it is not extensively used in CHF studies, and it lacks the possibility to distinguish between obstructive and central sleep apnoea, as well as determine sleep onset and awakenings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of the ApneaLink demonstrates that the device provides reliable information regarding AHI, when compared with a full polysomnography. 18,19 SDB was dichotomized into two groups; no SDB (AHI ,15/h of sleep) and SDB (AHI ≥15/h of sleep).…”
Section: Sleep-disordered Breathingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of linearization of the nasal pressure signal and processing of artifact in the pulse oximetry signal have been outlined in past validation studies. 16,17,20,21 Initial PM data analysis was automated (by ApneaLink software) with rules defined to match laboratory PSG settings. 22 Manual data review used the PSG data analysis platform after importing ApneaLink signals (EDF format with removal of automated results).…”
Section: Portable Study (Pm Study)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have one or more of the following limitations: (a) failure to study the PM device in its site of intended use, the home 18,19,27,28 ; (b) low sample size [16][17][18][19][20][21]27,28 ; (c) failure to collect oximetry data [16][17][18][19][20]27,29 ; (d) no randomization of order of comparison 18,19,27,28 ; and (d) no manual review of the raw PM data. [16][17][18][19][20]27,29,30 Our validation addresses these limitations.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An idea of the entrenched positions can be found in recent issues of Sleep [3][4][5] and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine [6]. With all the interests at stake [7], the debate needs carefully conducted studies aimed at evaluating automated software, for instance for automated detection of obstructive sleep apnea [8] or for automated sleep scoring like the one presented by Stege and colleagues in this issue of Sleep and Breathing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%