2019
DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i7/6091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Feedback Conceptions Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach mirrors the recent emphasis on preserving the authenticity of students' motivational orientation in educational research Subsequent analysis of the data focused on three primary aspects: validation and reliability assessment of the AMS in this unique context, and a descriptive analysis of each motivational scale. This tripartite analytical approach is in line with contemporary methodologies emphasizing the importance of validation and reliability testing in educational psychology instruments (Ghazali et al, 2019;Newton et al, n.d.) Onggo Susilo, Audrey Vivian Chandra, Rusijono, Andi Mariono / Adapting the Academic Motivation Scale for Homeschool Students in Indonesia: A Study on Reliability, Validity, and Motivational Profiles…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This approach mirrors the recent emphasis on preserving the authenticity of students' motivational orientation in educational research Subsequent analysis of the data focused on three primary aspects: validation and reliability assessment of the AMS in this unique context, and a descriptive analysis of each motivational scale. This tripartite analytical approach is in line with contemporary methodologies emphasizing the importance of validation and reliability testing in educational psychology instruments (Ghazali et al, 2019;Newton et al, n.d.) Onggo Susilo, Audrey Vivian Chandra, Rusijono, Andi Mariono / Adapting the Academic Motivation Scale for Homeschool Students in Indonesia: A Study on Reliability, Validity, and Motivational Profiles…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Data dependability was assessed using Cronbach alpha and composite reliability (Yusoff et al, 2020). The dependability of the instrument was concluded to be within acceptable bounds (Ghazali et al, 2019), since every item in this investigation was found to be greater than the predefined threshold value. Source: Authors' processed data (2024) Table 2 above demonstrates the strong reliability and convergent validity of the internal consistency of infrastructure, financial inclusion, innovation, government policy, and MSMEs' performance.…”
Section: B Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the analysis of PCA for the 25 items from ELQT, the raw variance explained by measures was 44.9%, over the minimum percentage of 40%. 14,9 The unexplained variance in the first contrast was 6.9%, which was far less than 15%. The eigenvalue from unexplained variance in the first contrast was 3.1.…”
Section: Unidimensionalitymentioning
confidence: 90%