2016
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an ‘endovascular-first’ approach to spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: an intention-to-treat analysis

Abstract: Our results support attempted embolization of SDAVFs prior to consideration of microsurgery, allowing for a less invasive treatment option in the same session as diagnostic angiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several treatment modalities have been described for intramedullary AVMs including microsurgical resection, 43 endovascular embolization, 44 and radiation treatment, 45 as well as a combination of these procedures. With respect to the different outcomes reported with these treatments, the gold standard of treatment is debatable, with some authors reporting successful outcomes using endovascular treatment alone, and others reporting the need for microsurgical resection as a first‐line treatment or after endovascular treatment, depending on the size of the lesion 45‐47 . In cases where lesions are large in size, involve the ventral half of the spinal cord, or involve multiple feeding vessels from the anterior spinal artery, definitive treatment is not feasible without substantial neurological dysfunction and iatrogenic disability postoperatively 43,44,48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatment modalities have been described for intramedullary AVMs including microsurgical resection, 43 endovascular embolization, 44 and radiation treatment, 45 as well as a combination of these procedures. With respect to the different outcomes reported with these treatments, the gold standard of treatment is debatable, with some authors reporting successful outcomes using endovascular treatment alone, and others reporting the need for microsurgical resection as a first‐line treatment or after endovascular treatment, depending on the size of the lesion 45‐47 . In cases where lesions are large in size, involve the ventral half of the spinal cord, or involve multiple feeding vessels from the anterior spinal artery, definitive treatment is not feasible without substantial neurological dysfunction and iatrogenic disability postoperatively 43,44,48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Studies demonstrate that there are no differences in the obliteration rates between the endovascular and microsurgical treatments, enabling the migration from embolization to surgery, either due to the impossibility of embolization, or due to inadequate occlusion. 7 Some services suggest that the initial attempt of embolization at the moment of the diagnostic arteriography is feasible; however, it has failure rates of 50%, 4,7 unlike the surgical treatment, which is definitive in all cases. 4 For proper embolization, it should be possible to navigate with the microcatheter to the fistulous point where the liquid emboligenic agent is injected, 3 which is not always possible, as in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no complete obliteration of the fistula, usually the patient is addressed for a microsurgical approach as soon as possible. Also, if there are doubts concerning the complete occlusion of the proximal radiculomedullary draining vein, a control angiographies are performed at one, three and six months later 2,9,12 . Complications: The complications that results from open surgical ligation or resection are; meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and wound dehiscence.…”
Section: Fig3 Savf: the Connection Between Radicular Artery And The mentioning
confidence: 99%