2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2015.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an automatic segmentation method to detect vertebral interfaces in ultrasound images

Abstract: Aim of this study was to perform a detailed clinical validation of a new fully automatic algorithm for vertebral interface segmentation in echographic images. Abdominal echographic scans of lumbar vertebrae L1-L4 were carried out on 150 female subjects with variable age and body mass index (BMI). Acquired datasets were automatically processed by the algorithm and the accuracy of the obtained segmentations was then evaluated by three independent experienced operators. Obtained results showed a very good specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The system is equipped with a convex 3.5 MHz transducer, which simultaneously detects B-mode ultrasound signals and unprocessed radiofrequency signals. Those which are analyzed by the machine's statistical algorithm (EchoStudio ® ; Echolight SRL) for each region of interest (ROI), taking into account the patient's ethnicity, age, sex and BMI and comparing them to a database of ~10,000 subjects (18,20,2426). The ROI for each patient included the usual sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: The lumbar spine (L1-L4 vertebrae approached from the abdomen) and the femoral necks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system is equipped with a convex 3.5 MHz transducer, which simultaneously detects B-mode ultrasound signals and unprocessed radiofrequency signals. Those which are analyzed by the machine's statistical algorithm (EchoStudio ® ; Echolight SRL) for each region of interest (ROI), taking into account the patient's ethnicity, age, sex and BMI and comparing them to a database of ~10,000 subjects (18,20,2426). The ROI for each patient included the usual sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: The lumbar spine (L1-L4 vertebrae approached from the abdomen) and the femoral necks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, QUS may have particular advantages over DXA, which make it suitable for a potentially wider use in the primary screening or pre-screening of osteoporosis and the identification of cases requiring DXA scanning (18,19): It is less expensive, does not use ionising radiation, uses smaller hardware and is portable. A recently introduced QUS method that integrates ultrasound imaging and radiofrequency signals is being used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and it produced results comparable to those obtained with the DXA method (20,21). To the best of our knowledge, this technique has never been used in a controlled study environment to assess BMD in Romanian RA patients and healthy controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Assim, o desafio para novos estudos está em identificar estratégias seguras e eficazes de intervenções que possam simultaneamente aperfeiçoar a saúde muscular, óssea e tratar a fragilidade física de idosos, para redução de quedas e fraturas. (AVENTAGGIATO, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Osteoporose E Sistema Musculoesqueléticounclassified
“…A previous published study showed a high degree of correlation between the T-score values provided by the two techniques -REMS and DXA for both lumbar spine (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) and femoral neck (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), [12]. Furthermore, REMS technology may have some advantages over DXA method -it is non-ionizing approach and it is portable, so this make it possible to do wider screening of osteoporosis and to detect earlier the cases requiring DXA scanning [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Orthopedics and Rheumatology Open Access Journal (Oroaj)mentioning
confidence: 99%