2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09266-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of algorithms to identify colorectal cancer patients from administrative claims data of a Japanese hospital

Abstract: Background Administrative claims data are a valuable source for clinical studies; however, the use of validated algorithms to identify patients is essential to minimize bias. We evaluated the validity of diagnostic coding algorithms for identifying patients with colorectal cancer from a hospital’s administrative claims data. Methods This validation study used administrative claims data from a Japanese university hospital between April 2017 and Marc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our study was conducted using administrative codes to identify variables. We used administrative codes that were used in previous studies, 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 32 and our manual medical records review of 100 randomly selected patients verified the accuracy of diagnostic codes for PLA, but it is still possible some cases were misclassified. Other conditions were also not captured without medical records review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our study was conducted using administrative codes to identify variables. We used administrative codes that were used in previous studies, 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 32 and our manual medical records review of 100 randomly selected patients verified the accuracy of diagnostic codes for PLA, but it is still possible some cases were misclassified. Other conditions were also not captured without medical records review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was CRC diagnosis during the follow-up period, identified by administrative codes described in previous studies (eTable 1 in Supplement 1 ). 21 , 22 , 23 We also collected mortality as a competing risk event. Mortality data were obtained from the VHA Vital Status File, which has excellent agreement with the National Death Index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%