2018
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01553-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Active Surveillance Testing for Clostridium difficile Colonization Using the cobas Cdiff Test

Abstract: infection (CDI) is not declining in the United States. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are used as part of active surveillance testing programs to prevent health care-associated infection. The objective of this study was to validate the cobas Cdiff Test on the cobas 4800 System (cobas) within a four-hospital system using prospectively collected perirectal swabs from asymptomatic patients at admission and during monthly intensive care unit (ICU) screening in an infection control CDI reduction program. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From September 2017 through August 2018 we conducted a quality improvement program where admitted patients had a peri-rectal swab collected for toxigenic C. difficile (TCD) and tested using the cobas 1 Cdiff Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA), a NAAT that detects toxin B gene (tcdB). The test and its use for peri-rectal swabs previously was validated for admission testing [22]. All patients who tested positive were placed into isolation (contact) precautions until discharge.…”
Section: Quality Improvement Initiative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From September 2017 through August 2018 we conducted a quality improvement program where admitted patients had a peri-rectal swab collected for toxigenic C. difficile (TCD) and tested using the cobas 1 Cdiff Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA), a NAAT that detects toxin B gene (tcdB). The test and its use for peri-rectal swabs previously was validated for admission testing [22]. All patients who tested positive were placed into isolation (contact) precautions until discharge.…”
Section: Quality Improvement Initiative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%