Abstract:Objective-With the upsurge in online dietary modification programmes, online dietary assessment tools are needed to capture food intake. Although the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet is recommended by the US Department of Agriculture, there are no online instruments that capture DASH food servings. Our objective was to assess the validity of a new, short, online dietary questionnaire developed to capture intake of DASH food servings. The DASH Online Questionnaire (OLQ) was validated against … Show more
“…Significant overestimations were observed only for a few nutrients (for example, EPA), which could be partly explained by the different nutritional contribution of the foods grouped together in the web-FFQ database (for example, types of fish) compared with specific food items in the FRs. Another factor to consider is the duration of the reference measure: 3 days of record may not have been enough to capture the real dietary intakes of the participants over 1 month, particularly for foods that are not consumed frequently (Apovian et al, 2010). Correlation coefficients considered as acceptable in FFQ validation studies range from 0.4-0.7 (Willet, 1994;Willet, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, differences in the frequency of consumption may be more likely to occur between a 3-day FR and a web-FFQ covering the previous month than between two FFQs covering the same period. In this regard, Apovian et al (2010) suggested that correlations may improve with tracking of more days of FR. Moreover, an important observation is that the IA-FFQ, like the web-FFQ, included questions about added fat and fat used for cooking and correlations for fat variables were much stronger between the IA-FFQ and the web-FFQ than between the 3-day FR and the web-FFQ.…”
Background/Objectives: To assess the validity and the reproducibility of a newly developed web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire (web-FFQ). Subjects/Methods: A total of 74 healthy subjects (34 men and 40 women) from the Québec City metropolitan area were asked to complete, in random order, the web-FFQ, a validated interviewer-administered FFQ (IA-FFQ) and a 3-day food record (3-day FR). Results: Mean intakes of 17/22 nutrients assessed between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR were not significantly different (differences o10%, PX0.11). Sex and energy-adjusted de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients for each nutrient varied from 0.12-0.98 (mean R ¼ 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.46; 0.63) between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR. All correlations were significant (Pp0.01) and above 0.34 (mean R ¼ 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.54; 0.65) between the web-FFQ and the IA-FFQ, except for sodium (R ¼ 0.17, P ¼ 0.14). Cross-classification analysis revealed that on average, 77% of subjects were classified in the same or adjacent quartile of nutrient intake between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR. Correlation coefficients for reproducibility of the web-FFQ tested 4-6 weeks apart in the same individuals were all equal or above 0.48 (Pp0.0001; mean R ¼ 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68; 0.76). More than 90% of the subjects were classified in the same or adjacent quartile between the two administrations of the web-FFQ, while only 0.8% was misclassified.Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the newly developed web-based FFQ appears to have reasonable validity and good reproducibility for assessing nutrient intakes at the group and individual levels in a population of healthy adults.
“…Significant overestimations were observed only for a few nutrients (for example, EPA), which could be partly explained by the different nutritional contribution of the foods grouped together in the web-FFQ database (for example, types of fish) compared with specific food items in the FRs. Another factor to consider is the duration of the reference measure: 3 days of record may not have been enough to capture the real dietary intakes of the participants over 1 month, particularly for foods that are not consumed frequently (Apovian et al, 2010). Correlation coefficients considered as acceptable in FFQ validation studies range from 0.4-0.7 (Willet, 1994;Willet, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, differences in the frequency of consumption may be more likely to occur between a 3-day FR and a web-FFQ covering the previous month than between two FFQs covering the same period. In this regard, Apovian et al (2010) suggested that correlations may improve with tracking of more days of FR. Moreover, an important observation is that the IA-FFQ, like the web-FFQ, included questions about added fat and fat used for cooking and correlations for fat variables were much stronger between the IA-FFQ and the web-FFQ than between the 3-day FR and the web-FFQ.…”
Background/Objectives: To assess the validity and the reproducibility of a newly developed web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire (web-FFQ). Subjects/Methods: A total of 74 healthy subjects (34 men and 40 women) from the Québec City metropolitan area were asked to complete, in random order, the web-FFQ, a validated interviewer-administered FFQ (IA-FFQ) and a 3-day food record (3-day FR). Results: Mean intakes of 17/22 nutrients assessed between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR were not significantly different (differences o10%, PX0.11). Sex and energy-adjusted de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients for each nutrient varied from 0.12-0.98 (mean R ¼ 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.46; 0.63) between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR. All correlations were significant (Pp0.01) and above 0.34 (mean R ¼ 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.54; 0.65) between the web-FFQ and the IA-FFQ, except for sodium (R ¼ 0.17, P ¼ 0.14). Cross-classification analysis revealed that on average, 77% of subjects were classified in the same or adjacent quartile of nutrient intake between the web-FFQ and the 3-day FR. Correlation coefficients for reproducibility of the web-FFQ tested 4-6 weeks apart in the same individuals were all equal or above 0.48 (Pp0.0001; mean R ¼ 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68; 0.76). More than 90% of the subjects were classified in the same or adjacent quartile between the two administrations of the web-FFQ, while only 0.8% was misclassified.Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the newly developed web-based FFQ appears to have reasonable validity and good reproducibility for assessing nutrient intakes at the group and individual levels in a population of healthy adults.
“…The significance of the research works that use Web-based food frequency questionnaires has increased in the last few years [6,23,24,26,29,30] and the validity and reproducibility of Web-based FFQs has also been evaluated [22,25,27,28].…”
Section: Web-based Food Frequency Questionnaires (Web-ffqs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFQs [22,6,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], online 24 hour dietary recalls [8,31,32,33,34] and combinations of both FFQs and 24HDRs [35,36,37,38]. A few similar reviews or states-of-the-art are found in the literature [39,40,1,41].…”
Objective: In this paper we aim to provide a general view of reported software tools and made and the works reported. Finally, some works that apply innovative technologies are outlined and the future trends for automating questionnaires in nutrition are identified and described as conclusions.
“…They therefore offer a new dietary assessment tool to measure adherence to the DASH diet, shown previously to reduce blood pressure and reduce risk of heart disease and stroke (13) . Their article provides some useful perspective on dietary measures to prevent high blood pressure.…”
Section: Assessment Of Diet For Prevention Of High Blood Pressurementioning
Salt, interwoven into so many critical features and events in our collective cultures, economies and socio-political histories, is now important chiefly for the roles it plays in human health. In this issue of Public Health Nutrition are two different views of dietary salt and health-first as a vehicle for iodine supplementation, and second, as a cause of chronic disease whose excessive intake should be reduced.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.