2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a two-fluid model on unsteady liquid–vapor water flows

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper is devoted to the validation of a two-fluid two-phase flow model in some highly unsteady situations involving strong rarefaction waves and shocks in water-vapor flows. The two-fluid model and its associated numerical method that were introduced in a previous work are first recalled, and details on the computational scheme and the verification of interfacial mass transfer terms are provided. Consistency with experimental data is checked in three configurations. First, a comparison with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific heat ratio g k is given by g k = C p, k =C v, k , and as in the model by Crouzet et al, 15 p v is taken to zero and p l is computed as in equation (13) …”
Section: Eosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The specific heat ratio g k is given by g k = C p, k =C v, k , and as in the model by Crouzet et al, 15 p v is taken to zero and p l is computed as in equation (13) …”
Section: Eosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment consists of a horizontal pipe (which has 1 m high slope), upstream tank, and downstream valve. The fluid pressure is measured at three points along the 36 m pipeline which are located at 36, 27, and 9 m. The main parameters of fluid are referenced to the literature, 15 and the specific data are listed in Tables 1 and 2 The speed is set as the boundary condition for the calculation as shown in Figure 2, where the interval velocity between 1173 and 1424 ms is used to forecast mixed pressure changes at different points. As seen in Figure 2, there is a good agreement between the simulation and experimental value in the result of mixed pressure, with a slight deviation only at peak pressure, but they still follow the same trend in the pressure.…”
Section: Simpson's Valve Closure Water Hammer Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations