1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02935.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Telephone Cognitive Assessment Battery

Abstract: Research studies involving ascertainment of cognitive status of older people, particularly those that require periodic follow-up, such as those focusing on healthy aging, commonly suffer from lack of representativeness of subjects, often brought about by problems related to mobility of potential participants. It is also crucial that normal individuals who are recruited initially to serve as controls in epidemiologic studies of dementing illnesses be reevaluated periodically, and this may be hindered by the sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the strengths of the correlations with in-person testing found here are comparable to those that we reported previously for the same test battery applied to ARDS survivors [8] and the correlations reported for other telephone neurocognitive test batteries [21-25]. Two items in the test battery did not correlate as well as the others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Overall, the strengths of the correlations with in-person testing found here are comparable to those that we reported previously for the same test battery applied to ARDS survivors [8] and the correlations reported for other telephone neurocognitive test batteries [21-25]. Two items in the test battery did not correlate as well as the others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These batteries, often derived from the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE, Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975) have been used successfully to test adults with a focus on screening for cognitive impairment. Such instruments, including the Brief Screen for Cognition Impairment (Hill et al, 2005), the Memory and Aging Telephone Screen (Rabin et al, 2007), or the Telephone Cognitive Assessment Battery (Debanne et al, 1997) do not typically provide a comprehensive assessment of cognitive domains (see Lachman & Tun, 2008; Martin-Khan, Wootton, & Gray, 2010; Soubelet & Salthouse, 2011; Wolfson et al, 2009, for reviews) and are not sensitive enough to variations in cognitive abilities across adulthood (Wolfson et al, 2009). Due to ceiling effects and limited variance they cannot typically discriminate among those with mild deficits or those in the normal range of functioning especially when comparing adults of different ages.…”
Section: Monitoring Cognitive Functioning: Psychometric Properties Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, persons with signs and symptoms of cognitive impairment may benefit from telephone screening in terms of determining the need for further medical evaluation. The successful use of telephone screening for the detection of cognitive impairment has been documented in several reports [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%