2008
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00130907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a single-channel airflow monitor for screening of sleep-disordered breathing

Abstract: A simple screening method for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is desirable for primary care practices. In the present study, a simple monitor, which utilises a new type of flow sensor and a novel algorithm, was prospectively validated.Home recording for 2 nights with the monitor only, followed by in-laboratory recording with the monitor together with polysomnography, were carried out in consecutive patients (n5100) suspected of SDB. A subjective sleep log was also recorded. The signal was analysed using power… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53,81 Six studies evaluated the performance of single channel HSAT against attended or unattended PSG (see supplemental material, Table S47 through Table S50, and Table S51 through Table S53, respectively). 73,[100][101][102][103]111 A single study evaluated the performance of oximetry against unattended in-home PSG. 111 Using a cutoff of AHI ≥ 5, accuracy was 73% (95% CI: 68 to 78%) in a high-risk population, and 79% (95% CI: 74 to 84%) in a low-risk population.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53,81 Six studies evaluated the performance of single channel HSAT against attended or unattended PSG (see supplemental material, Table S47 through Table S50, and Table S51 through Table S53, respectively). 73,[100][101][102][103]111 A single study evaluated the performance of oximetry against unattended in-home PSG. 111 Using a cutoff of AHI ≥ 5, accuracy was 73% (95% CI: 68 to 78%) in a high-risk population, and 79% (95% CI: 74 to 84%) in a low-risk population.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We asked the participants to use a single-channel airflow monitor (Somnie; NGK Spark Plug Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Japan) with a portable monitor attached below the nose during one night 17 of sleep at home and to fill in the self-administered questionnaire on the same day. The Somnie uses a polyvinylidene fluoride film as a thermal sensor to detect airflow, stores the airflow signal as digital data at a sampling frequency of 10 Hz and can record data for 24 h. The airflow sensor is designed to detect both nasal and oral breathing.…”
Section: Assessment Of Sdbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of this method lies in strong agreement between the automated and manual analyses of airflow signal, which has been confirmed in a previous study. 17 The criterion for SDB was defined by the RDI level as 10 and 20 events per hour, because these RDI cutoffs were found to represent AHIs of X15 and X30, respectively, as determined by full polysomnography (PSG); the corresponding sensitivities were 0.91 and 0.89, and specificities 0.82 and 0.96. 17 We eventually used a cutoff for RDI of 10 (corresponding to AHI of 15) for the analysis, because the number of RDI X20 (corresponding to AHI of 30) in weight less categories is too small (n ¼ 20).…”
Section: Assessment Of Sdbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the present study was conducted, the types of monitoring devices for SAS/SDB screenings were limited, and we determined that pulse oximetry would be suitable in terms of convenience and cost-effectiveness. In recent years, flow sensors (placed in the nose and mouth to monitor airflow during sleep) that objectively determine apnea and hypopnea during sleep have been developed and are reported to be more feasible for screening of SDB than pulse oximetry 26,27) . The ideal SAS/SDB screening test allows for efficient transition to subsequent comprehensive tests and treatment with as little as possible waiting time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%