2017
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1328651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a railway inline seating model for occupants injury biomechanics

Abstract: This paper presents the validation of a finite element model in LS-DYNA of the interior inline seating layout simulating a frontal rail impact event for which the experimental test results provide the reference for the injury biomechanics of the occupants. The representative layout consists in two rows of seats and its supporting structures modelled with nonlinear finite elements and the crash acceleration pulse that represents the impact of the railway vehicle structure is imposed in the floor of the coach. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also provides accurate and efficient methodologies for the description of the large rigid body motion of the anatomical segments and mechanisms of the ATD [ 12 , 13 ]. However, non-linear finite element methods have an unsurpassed ability to represent all details of the structural deformations being directly linked to geometric modeling software that enables the generation of complex models with simplicity [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Multibody models are more efficient and less computationally expensive than finite element models for handling large movement dynamics of ATD models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also provides accurate and efficient methodologies for the description of the large rigid body motion of the anatomical segments and mechanisms of the ATD [ 12 , 13 ]. However, non-linear finite element methods have an unsurpassed ability to represent all details of the structural deformations being directly linked to geometric modeling software that enables the generation of complex models with simplicity [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Multibody models are more efficient and less computationally expensive than finite element models for handling large movement dynamics of ATD models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%