1989
DOI: 10.1039/an9891401287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a quantitative procedure for the extraction of sterols from edible oils using radiolabelled compounds

Abstract: The work described in this paper is integrated in an analytical programme organised by the Community Bureau of Reference with the aim of developing reference materials certified for sterol content. Preliminary inter-comparison of methods showed that the level of agreement of the results was insufficient for certification purposes. Errors could occur in the different steps before the final determination by gas-liquid chromatography. It was, therefore, decided to validate a quantitative procedure for the isolati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mixture of polar and nonpolar solvents has been suggested to give better cholesterol extraction from food materials because cholesterol in these samples is usually bound by many other biological compounds such as lipoproteins, proteins, and phospholipids (Sweeney and Weihrauch 1976; Yeagle 2005; Dowhan and others 2008), and a multiple extraction approach was thought to be more suitable to remove membrane cholesterol (Sweeney and Weihrauch 1976). With saponification of extracted lipids or direct saponification of samples, however, results of other studies indicated that single or multiple extraction by hexane (Kovacs and others 1979; Al‐Hasani and others 1990, 1993; Indyk 1990; Patton and others 1990; Fenton and Sim 1991; Fenton 1992) or by diethyl ether (Lognay and others 1989; Hwang and others 2003) or single extraction by toluene (Oles and others 1990; Dinh and others 2008) yielded sufficient recovery of cholesterol in foods, even in complex matrices such as meat and egg yolk. Hexane was usually the favored solvent because of its lower polarity compared with toluene (Gu and others 2004), which limits the formation of an emulsion; however, we have experienced frequent formation of a viscous aqueous phase when using methanolic KOH and hexane in our laboratory, which greatly interfered with the extraction and separation.…”
Section: Cholesterol Analytical Methods In Meat and Poultry Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixture of polar and nonpolar solvents has been suggested to give better cholesterol extraction from food materials because cholesterol in these samples is usually bound by many other biological compounds such as lipoproteins, proteins, and phospholipids (Sweeney and Weihrauch 1976; Yeagle 2005; Dowhan and others 2008), and a multiple extraction approach was thought to be more suitable to remove membrane cholesterol (Sweeney and Weihrauch 1976). With saponification of extracted lipids or direct saponification of samples, however, results of other studies indicated that single or multiple extraction by hexane (Kovacs and others 1979; Al‐Hasani and others 1990, 1993; Indyk 1990; Patton and others 1990; Fenton and Sim 1991; Fenton 1992) or by diethyl ether (Lognay and others 1989; Hwang and others 2003) or single extraction by toluene (Oles and others 1990; Dinh and others 2008) yielded sufficient recovery of cholesterol in foods, even in complex matrices such as meat and egg yolk. Hexane was usually the favored solvent because of its lower polarity compared with toluene (Gu and others 2004), which limits the formation of an emulsion; however, we have experienced frequent formation of a viscous aqueous phase when using methanolic KOH and hexane in our laboratory, which greatly interfered with the extraction and separation.…”
Section: Cholesterol Analytical Methods In Meat and Poultry Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have found it useful to further clean up the extract in edible oils. This has been carried out by thin layer chromatography (TLC)84, 155 or column chromatography 140. 157 When the conventional approach is applied for the extraction of the unsaponifiable matter and the sample clean‐up process, the analysis time needed is problematic: these techniques are time‐consuming, laborious and have little potential for automation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has shown that total cholesterol recovery reached 100.571.4%, that cholesteryl ester was saponified quantitatively without appreciable amounts of degradation products and that the method leads to quantitative recovery of sterols regardless of the nature of the fatty material tested (Lognay et al, 1989;Marlier et al, 1990). The procedure has been used as the basis for the certification of reference materials (Lognay et al, 1992(Lognay et al, , 1995.…”
Section: Gc-ms Identificationmentioning
confidence: 98%