2020
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES)

Abstract: BackgroundThe Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) is a validated, patient‐reported outcome measure to assess the body surface area affected with vitiligo. Information on how to translate the obtained score into extent, severity and impact strata (mild–moderate–severe) is still lacking. Stratification is helpful to define inclusion criteria for trials, enables comparison and pooling of trial results and can be used for epidemiological research.ObjectivesThe aim was to develop extent, severity and imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be rated by clinician-reported methods where higher grades correspond to more severe disorder [77][78][79]: body surface area (BSA, the percentage of lesions affected), Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI, BSA*residual depigmentation, ranging from 0 to 100), newly developed Vitiligo Extent Score (VES, 0-6 degree of the affection extent), and Vitiligo Disease Activity (VIDA) scores (− 1 to 4 point scale). In parallel, self-assessment tools have also been introduced including Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA-VES) e Trichrome lesions (black arrows) and poorly defined borders (white arrows) [80,81] and Self Assessed Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (SA-VASI) [82]. Up till now, there are no standardized methods.…”
Section: Diagnosis Differential Diagnosis and Disease Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be rated by clinician-reported methods where higher grades correspond to more severe disorder [77][78][79]: body surface area (BSA, the percentage of lesions affected), Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI, BSA*residual depigmentation, ranging from 0 to 100), newly developed Vitiligo Extent Score (VES, 0-6 degree of the affection extent), and Vitiligo Disease Activity (VIDA) scores (− 1 to 4 point scale). In parallel, self-assessment tools have also been introduced including Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA-VES) e Trichrome lesions (black arrows) and poorly defined borders (white arrows) [80,81] and Self Assessed Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (SA-VASI) [82]. Up till now, there are no standardized methods.…”
Section: Diagnosis Differential Diagnosis and Disease Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For target lesions, mostly in the context of clinical trials, digital image analysis can be proposed 19 . Stratification of extent and severity into global categories (limited/mild, moderate, extensive/severe) based on one study (patients' perspective) was as follow: Extent ≤1.05% BSA for limited, >1.05%–6.45% for moderate and >6.45% for extensive, Severity ≤2.07% BSA for mild, >2.07%–4.8% for moderate and >4.8% for severe 20‐22 . Extent represents only one aspect of the ‘severity’ perception from the patients' perspective; therefore, other items need to be taken into account, for instance, location of lesions (visible areas), disease impact, skin phototype and disease activity 21 …”
Section: Severity Scoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitiligo global Impact scale 0 to 10 or 5‐point scale), or with a more comprehensive burden scale [e.g. Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIPs), Vitiligo Quality of Life scale (VitiQOL) and Vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS‐22)] 21,22,28‐33 …”
Section: Assessment Of the Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that only 15% of vitiligo cases are Non-Segmental vitiligo (NSV) [37][38][39][40], we estimated a total of 279,000 NSV patients in Italy in 2022. Among these, 152,000 received a diagnosis, with 33% classified as having BSA <0.5% (Not Severe at all), 31% with BSA 0.5%-3.5% (Mild), 27% with BSA 3.5%-10% (Moderate/Severe), and 9% with BSA >10% (Very Severe) [41].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%